- Sarah Palin Channel makes online debut as counter to mainstream media
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Freak lightning storm kills 1, injures 7 on California beach
- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
Kentucky editorial roundup
Question of the Day
Recent editorials from Kentucky newspapers:
Lexington (Kentucky) Herald-Leader on Kentucky and smoking:
A decade into its pioneering smoking ban, Ireland is dancing to a happy tune of more tourists and healthier people.
Meanwhile, Kentucky is stuck in its same old dirge of addiction, denial and early death.
The contrast between the smoke-free isle and Kentucky’s No. 1 rankings in smoking and cancer could not be more discouraging.
The latest example came last week, when the Kentucky Supreme Court blocked local health boards from protecting the public from the deadly effects of breathing other people’s smoke.
The court struck down a smoke-free regulation enacted in 2011 by the Bullitt County Board of Health.
The decision was a victory for the elected Bullitt Fiscal Court and the county’s eight city councils, which challenged the health board’s action.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously. But the opinion’s author, Justice Bill Cunningham, had to strain and stretch to explain away a century of high-court decisions upholding public health boards’ authority and duty to protect Kentuckians’ health.
In last week’s ruling, the high court relied heavily on the legislature’s intent when it enacted a key enabling law in 1954, no doubt, Cunningham wrote, “in chambers fogged with a haze of smoke.”
Lawmakers, the court reasoned, would not “have remotely foreseen” that 60 years later a health board would use its authority to ban smoking in public places.
Of course, lawmakers also would not have foreseen bioterrorism, HIV, MRSA, food-borne hepatitis outbreaks, the birth control pill or the polio vaccine that was not introduced until 1955.
Binding public health officials to what Kentucky lawmakers might have anticipated in 1954 falls far short of judicious.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq