TAUBE: How GOP can sell a 20 percent flat tax rate

Americans are ready for a levy that’s simple and fair

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

For the Republican Party to succeed in this November’s midterm elections, one thing is clear: Superior ideas must be a top priority.

It’s not enough for the GOP to simply oppose every political and economic idea that the Democrats propose. Rather, Republicans need to propose their own policies, provide straightforward explanations of why they make sense, and prove how they will ultimately benefit society.

Here’s an opening strategy: To distinguish themselves from the tax-and-spend liberal Democrats, the GOP should support a flat tax.

I can already hear some deep sighs from the peanut gallery. “We’ve been down this path before,” some will say. “It didn’t sell, so why would we waste our time with this again?”

As someone who has written about the flat tax for numerous publications, I can tell you why. First, it has never been properly explained to voters. Second, political messaging about its benefits has always been on the weak side.

Certainly, Milton Friedman laid the important groundwork for a 23.5 percent flat-rate income tax in his seminal 1962 book “Capitalism and Freedom.”

He was followed by Alvin Rabushka and Robert Hall, who proposed a 19 percent flat tax (to be filed on a postcard) combined with personal exemptions for married couples, single-parent families and dependents.

Various politicians and public figures, including Steve Forbes, Phil Gramm, Dick Armey, Richard C. Shelby, Richard G. Lugar and Pat Buchanan, touted their own flat-tax strategies. Each proposal contained a different flat rate, number of deductions and so forth.

Do you see a problem developing? There were too many flat-tax proposals being proposed by too many individuals. What this led to can summarized in one simple phrase: information overload.

The task of demonizing a flat tax then became incredibly easy for Democrats.

Consider what happened to Mr. Forbes, the most visible supporter in recent times. He was treated with utter contempt owing to his wealth and social standing. Ergo, this thought-provoking flat-tax proposal was transformed by the political left into a money grab for him — and his rich and famous friends.

The Republicans, who were already suffering from flat tax on the brain, ran away from it.

Ironically, the flat tax ended up having greater traction in countries with histories of corruption, political unrest or periods of financial malaise. This includes Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Belize, Jamaica, Serbia, Bulgaria, Poland and tiny Mauritius.

Even China has given the flat tax more serious consideration than the United States, for goodness’ sake.

Political and financial histories aside, the flat tax should have been a natural policy for the Republicans to spearhead to victory. I think this can still be accomplished. Here are some ways to enhance the GOP’s political messaging skills:

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts