Bills would improve transparency in Mississippi

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

RIDGELAND, Miss. (AP) - If you’re a champion of open government, then for the past several years you’ve lived in an exciting but bewildering time.

Thanks to smartphones and high-speed Internet access, the tools of instant communication are more accessible today than ever before. And public interest in the activities of government has never been higher.

On your telephone, you can watch a live video from an event happening halfway around the world. On a tablet device no larger than a comic book, you can download and watch a full-length film.

It ought to be easier than ever for Mississippians to get an up-close view of their government at work.

Unfortunately, too many of Mississippi’s institutions of government still behave as though it were the Dark Ages.

Since 1983, the Public Records Act has recognized that the products of government are public property. Under the law, if you want to review a court file or read the minutes from a city council meeting, then that is your right.

But for years, if you wanted a reliable chance of taking advantage of that right, then all the smartphones and tablets in the world couldn’t help you. What you really needed were deep pockets and a room full of lawyers.

That’s not the way it ought to be. That’s no way for a democratic government to behave. And that’s not the Mississippi that the framers of the Public Records Act envisioned more than 30 years ago.

Fortunately, the Mississippi Legislature still has a chance to level the playing field a little bit.

Two important bills have been making their ways through the Legislature for the past couple of months, and both would bring needed changes to the way public-records requests are handled in our state.

Reducing Public Records Cost: HB928

For the past several years, one way government agencies have deflected public-records requests is to require the requester to pay enormous fees associated with the preparation of the documents being requested.

For example, if you walked into your local chancery clerk’s office and asked to review a case file, they might smile and offer to give you all the time you need - on the condition that you pay a staff attorney’s hourly rate for as long as it takes to prepare the documents for you.

There’s nothing wrong with a public body requiring a small fee to reimburse it for its costs.

But in recent years, some government agencies have conditioned a public-records request on prepayment of hundreds of dollars - and sometimes more. That is outrageous, and any state that believes in open government ought to find it completely unacceptable.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks