Georgia editorial roundup

Story Topics
Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Recent editorials from Georgia newspapers:

March 16

Savannah (Ga.) Morning News on enforcing gun laws better than passing new ones:

U.S. District Senior Judge B. Avant Edenfield calls it “somewhat troubling” that a convicted felon who’s employed as a city of Savannah water department employee was arrested for carrying a handgun.

He’s too judicious.

This situation isn’t somewhat troubling. It’s flat-out dangerous. Armed felons are why law-abiding people avoid certain streets at night and certain neighborhoods during the day. They’re why passing more gun laws tend to do little good and why violent crime rates are too high.

The city employee, David Thompson, 32, pleaded guilty last October to possession of a firearm - a 9mm Smith & Wesson. The feds consider it one of the top 10 weapons preferred by criminals.

A convicted felon is barred from using or possessing a firearm or dangerous weapon. Of course, that doesn’t stop many of them from doing it. They’re betting they won’t get caught.

And they usually aren’t. But in this instance, police stopped Thompson in a car last April for not wearing a seatbelt and for a window-tint violation. The officer smelled marijuana, and Thompson admitted to smoking a marijuana cigar.

He then volunteered that he was packing, too. So give him a point for honesty. But then subtract about a zillion points for Grade A baloney for saying he was carrying the gun to protect his family. Really?

Police said they found seven credit cards from seven different people in the vehicle. They found a digital scale commonly used in drug transactions. They found 1.4 grams of weed.

They also found 38 rounds of ammo. It sounded like Thompson need protection, all right - perhaps from others who were breaking the law.

Incredulously, Thompson was married to a Metro cop. If that’s not sufficient protection against most kinds of violence, nothing is.

The city’s personnel policies don’t prevent a convicted felon from working for the city. That’s fair. People who have paid their debts to society - and who follow society’s rules - deserve an opportunity to become contributing members of society.

But those who haven’t learned any lessons don’t deserve any breaks. This case also raises more red flags about the troubled Metro police department: How many cops are married to convicted felons? Does the city know about it? What is being done to make sure public safety isn’t compromised?

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks