- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
IG has questions about Pentagon’s Afghan incinerator review
Question of the Day
The nation’s top investigator in Afghanistan is questioning just how thoroughly Defense Department officials tried to correct issues related to a problem-plagued $5.4 million trash incinerator, and announced they are launching their own investigation.
The incinerator at the Sharana Forward Operating Base went through a 30-month delay before it was turned over to U.S. troops – at which point officials discovered it still needed $1 million in repair work. Yet the contractor who built it was paid in full anyway.
That prompted a review by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers who determined that “none of those personnel assigned to provide oversight on the incinerator contract failed to appropriately perform their assigned duties on the contract” and that “the incinerator system was turned over to its military customer in fully operable condition.”
But the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, or SIGAR, isn’t satisfied and is questioning just how thorough the Pentagon’s review was.
In a letter sent to Defense Department leaders, the investigative office says it wants to know why the contractor was paid in full despite turning over equipment that required $1 million in repairs.
The Corps never questioned SIGAR’s finding that some of the problems with the incinerator could pose a health hazards, inspectors noted.
Saying there is an “absence of further documentation, justification, and support showing why the decision was made to accept the substandard work on these incinerators,” SIGAR said they are launching their own investigation into why the incinerators were so costly to taxpayers.
The incinerators won the Golden Hammer award from The Washington Times for wasteful spending in December.
SIGAR reported that the incinerators have since been dismantled by Afghan forces that took over control of the base.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Phillip Swarts is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times, covering fiscal waste, fraud and political ethics. He is a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University and previously worked as an investigative reporter for the Washington Guardian. Phillip can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Golden Hammer: Railroad board pays $1B in bogus disability benefit
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable to terrorists despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Insurgent-allied businesses in Afghanistan eligible for U.S. taxpayer aid
- Ex-Gitmo detainee Moazzam Begg charged with terrorism
- Chicago shooting spree: 22 people shot in 12 hours
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- EDITORIAL: For too many gays, 'tolerance' is a one-way street
- PRUDEN: Cooling the manufactured impeachment panic
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Feds accept boredom, lack of work as excuses for surfing porn on clock
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world