- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
DOJ asks US justices to reinstate abortion law
Question of the Day
The Republican-authored law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles. Supporters contend the law ensures continuity of care if a woman experiences complications following an abortion; opponents counter conservative-leaning hospitals won’t grant abortion providers such privileges, which makes the law a back-door method of limiting abortions.
Gov. Scott Walker signed the law in July. Planned Parenthood and Affiliated Medical Services filed a federal lawsuit in Madison the same day. They alleged the law would force the organizations to close two abortion clinics in Appleton and Milwaukee because providers at the facility lack admitting privileges, forcing women to drive hundreds of extra miles to find a provider.
U.S. District Judge William Conley issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law from taking effect while he ponders the case. He set a trial for May.
DOJ, which is controlled by Republican Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, asked the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to lift the injunction but the court refused in December.
DOJ filed a petition with the Supreme Court asking it take to the case and rule that abortion providers don’t have standing to bring claims on behalf of their patients. The agency also argues that three other federal appellate courts have upheld admitting privileges as rationally related to state interest in maternal health.
Lester Pines, an attorney for Planned Parenthood, called the request “a long shot at best.” He said it’s clear that doctors can bring lawsuits on behalf of their patients if legislation impedes access to care. Regardless, he said, it’s unlikely the high court would take the case with a trial looming in May.
“It’s not really something that has a serious chance of being accepted by the Supreme Court,” Pines said.
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- House backs faster deportations, cancels 'Dreamer' policy
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- HATCH: Destroying the Senate and our liberties
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors