Continued from page 1

What in Hillary’s resume makes her fit for taking on the awesome powers of the presidency? It is hard to think of any achievement she led as the senator from New York, which she hoped to use as a springboard to the White House in 2008.

Would the nation look to her as someone who knows a lot about health care and can begin fixing the Obamacare wreckage? Hardly.

You may remember that Bill Clinton put her in charge of designing his failed health care reform plan in the 1990s. It was a Rube Goldberg contraption that was so complicated no one could explain it to the American people.

I remember leading a forum on Hillarycare during that time when the chief lobbyist of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) told me he never fully understood how it worked.

Neither did Democratic leaders in Congress, because they never held a vote on her health care plan, either in committee or on the House and Senate floor.

Now, fast-forward to her role as secretary of state in the Obama administration, a job for which she had little or no experience or in-depth knowledge.

Can anyone point to a major foreign policy achievement during her tenure? For many observers, she seemed to be trying to outdo her predecessor, Condoleezza Rice, in the number of countries she visited, but beyond that did little in the job.

Miss Rice, after all, had served as White House national security adviser to President George W. Bush, and was a noted expert in Soviet and East European Affairs. Mrs. Clinton’s background was all in politics, as first lady and a senator who lost to Mr. Obama in the 2008 presidential primaries.

If her four years as secretary of state and chief foreign policy adviser to Mr. Obama is remembered for anything, it’s the brutal terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, where U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other American officials were killed.

For months, her State Department received numerous, fearful pleas from Stevens for additional security leading up to the attacks, which went unheeded. In the immediate aftermath, her staff tried to downplay what happened as merely a protest that got out of control.

Mrs. Clinton was criticized for not responding to the calls for protection, and in lengthy Senate testimony, she delivered her now-famous response, “What difference — at this point, what difference does it make?”

For the answer to that politically combustible question, we will have to await the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. That is, if she runs.

Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.