- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
Business owners testify against indoor smoke ban
Question of the Day
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) - A bill that would ban smoking in indoor work places and public places in Alaska has drawn opposition from some business owners.
HB360, from Rep. Lindsey Holmes, R-Anchorage, would ban smoking in most commercial buildings, including businesses, restaurants and bars. She told the House Health and Social Services Committee on Tuesday that her goal with the bill is to protect workers from secondhand smoke.
“House Bill 360 is the Smoke-Free Workplace Bill, or what I call the ‘Take it Outside Bill,’” she said. “We’re not with this bill trying to tell people whether or not they can smoke, we’re trying to protect people who are in their own workplaces from having to breathe secondhand smoke.”
Some local governments already have bans of this kind, while other municipalities and unincorporated areas do not.
Holmes said the bill has the support of health-advocacy groups and hundreds of businesses.
But the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner reported (http://bit.ly/1o1eHRW ) that most business owners who called in to testify on the bill were opposed to it. They said there are already choices between smoking and non-smoking establishments in many communities. Some also said government doesn’t have a place in regulating restaurants on this matter.
Larry Hackenmiller, a member of the Interior Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant and Retailer’s Association, called the bill an attack on freedom and personal choice.
“This bull about, well, the employees’ safety, it’s a matter of preference and an employee may not like the smell of smoke or whatever,” he said. “They keep on telling you that we have a right to smoke-free air, well, that’s true, but you also have the right to smoke-filled air. Those rights exist for everybody. The Constitution doesn’t restrict you from being stupid or smart when it comes to smoking.”
Several others testified in support of the measure, citing health concerns.
Committee members asked questions about enforcement. Holmes said she didn’t intend to create a burdensome bureaucracy and was willing to work on the bill.
The bill was held for further consideration.
A companion bill also is pending in the Senate.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq