Oklahoma judge strikes execution law over privacy

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - An Oklahoma judge voided the state’s execution law Wednesday, agreeing with inmates that a “veil of secrecy” preventing them from seeking information about the drugs used in lethal injections violated their rights under the state constitution.

Oklahoma is among the states that have promised companies confidentiality if they will provide the sedatives or paralyzing agents used to execute condemned prisoners, and went beyond that to prevent information from being revealed even in court.

Oklahoma County District Judge Patricia Parrish ruled Wednesday that preventing inmates Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner from pressing their claims in a courtroom went too far.

“I think that the secrecy statute is a violation of due process because access to the courts has been denied,” Parrish ruled. Her decision did not undermine their convictions or death sentences - just the state’s procedures for carrying out executions.

Lockett is set to die April 22 and Warner a week later. Lawyers for the state promised an appeal, but Parrish’s ruling could have broader implications.

“Judge Parrish’s decision is a major outcome that should have a reverberating impact on other states that are facing similar kinds of transparency issues,” said Deborah W. Denno, a professor of law at Fordham University.

Arkansas and Missouri keep execution information secret, and Texas officials last week refused to say where they had recently obtained a batch of execution drugs. The Texas attorney general has previously said the information is public.

Attorneys for two Texas inmates facing execution next month with a new batch of pentobarbital obtained by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice filed a lawsuit Wednesday demanding the prison agency disclose the identity of the new supplier.

The petition filed in state court in Austin also sought an emergency order requiring state authorities to identify when the drug was obtained and any results of tests on its potency and purity.

At Wednesday’s hearing in Oklahoma City, Parrish rejected arguments by Assistant Attorney General John Hadden that the inmates’ rights weren’t being restricted.

Aaron Cooper, a spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office, said the confidentiality question for the source of execution drugs had already been settled at the state and federal level.

“The entire reason for Oklahoma’s confidentiality statute is to protect those who provide lethal injection drugs to the state from threats, coercion and intimidation,” Cooper said.

Lockett and Warner’s challenge came after inmates in Ohio and Oklahoma showed signs of distress during their executions in January. Lockett, 38, and Warner, 46, wanted to know who was making the drugs that would kill them and whether the drugs were pure.

Jen Moreno, a staff attorney at U.C. Berkeley School of Law’s Death Penalty Clinic, said Parrish’s decision “shows there is a growing concern by courts that states are keeping information secret.”

“Ultimately, I think her decision is obviously a good step toward bringing transparency and accountability to what’s happening in Oklahoma,” she said. “I think turning to the secrecy and turning to untested or risky compounded drugs and risky procedures is a trend we’ve seen in a lot of states and a push to keep that information secret.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks