- Associated Press - Thursday, March 27, 2014

DETROIT (AP) - Is there a difference between the words “of” and “after?” A federal court says no, at least not in a dispute between a Detroit man and a debt collector.

Carl Wallace sued Diversified Consultants. He accused the company of violating a federal law because of the wording of a debt notice related to a $2,000 phone bill.

Wallace was asked to respond within 30 days “of” receiving a notice. But the law covering debt collections says people have 30 days to respond “after” getting a notice.

So what? Indeed, that’s what an appeals court said Wednesday in affirming the dismissal of a class-action lawsuit in Detroit federal court. The court doubts that anyone who got the letter was confused.

Attorney Brian Parker of Bingham Farms was seeking thousands of dollars.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide