- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
EDITORIAL: Nate Silver, bearer of bad tidings for Democrats
Democrats don’t like star pundit’s latest prognostications
Question of the Day
When Nate Silver, the young statistician and blogger, called the 2008 election for Barack Obama, his uncanny accuracy was celebrated. He correctly called the result in 49 of the 50 states.
Nor was his performance a fluke. His Senate picks and forecasts in 2012 were equally prescient. "And once again," said Mr. Obama two years ago, "Nate Silver completely nailed it. The guy is amazing." Or at least, he used to be amazing.
Now that Mr. Silver says the arithmetic favors Republicans to take the Senate in the fall midterm elections, he's no longer the left's favorite soothsayer.
Paul Krugman, the economics (and other things) columnist for The New York Times says he's "not impressed" with Mr. Silver, not since he fled the old gray lady to join ESPN, expanding his analysis to include the winners and losers of the national college basketball tournament.
Politics remains the focus of Mr. Silver's blog, FiveThirtyEight.com. "The Democrats' position has deteriorated somewhat since last summer," writes Mr. Silver, "with President Obama's approval ratings down to 42 or 43 percent from an average of about 45 percent before.
Furthermore, compared to the campaigns of 2010 or 2012, the GOP has done a better job of recruiting credible candidates, with some exceptions."
These are not bold predictions. Even the nearsighted can see what look suspiciously like vultures circling the headquarters of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
The committee has dispatched nearly a dozen desperate fundraising appeals in the past four months with Mr. Silver's name in the subject line, the National Journal reports.
They're begging for a lot of money to "save" the Senate. Guy Cecil, the campaign's executive director, concedes the peril Democrats face. Indeed, he finds Mr. Silver's predictions something of a fundraiser's godsend.
"We view the latest projection as a reminder," he wrote in a recent memo, "that we have a challenging map and important work still to do in order to preserve our majority."
The president still gets polite applause at a fashionable Manhattan cocktail party or a Hollywood fundraiser, but in the rest of the country he's as welcome as the Ebola virus. No candidate with a "D" after his name wants to be seen with a politician, any politician, with a 59 percent disapproval rating.
That signals it's time to call the undertaker in red states such as West Virginia, South Dakota, Montana and Arkansas, where Democrats are being measured for shrouds. The Republicans need a net of six seats to win control of the Senate.
By Mr. Silver's calculations, that's within reach, but it won't be easy, and only foolish Republicans think it will be. "Republicans will also have to win at least two tossup races," he says, "perhaps in Alaska, North Carolina or Michigan, or to convert states such as New Hampshire into that category." That's plausible, but difficult.
No one who has been watching Mr. Obama's descent into the basement or its effect in the states can find Mr. Silver's predictions weird or outlandish. He's not a partisan. Democrats are learning how Republicans felt when Mr. Silver's projections warned the Republicans not to order the champagne for election night 2008. Nate Silver is just the messenger.
About the Author
- Take a first look at The Washington Times' new dynamic website
- 'Standing by Israel' special report
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ventura's court win is really a loss
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ukraine is not so easily understood
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reagan didn't deregulate airlines
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
Get Breaking Alerts
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Iraq Christians get meeting with top Obama aide
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
- EDITORIAL: Pols' misrepresentations fuel public's cynicism about politics
- EDITORIAL: 'Operation Choke Point': A noose for business
- EDITORIAL: For too many gays, 'tolerance' is a one-way street
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- EDITORIAL: Meriam Ibrahim's happy immigrant story