- House passes VA reform compromise
- Obama admin to blame for HealthCare.gov woes, $840M cost: GAO
- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Discrimination is the basis of all law
Question of the Day
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has rationalized her veto of a bill designed to protect freedom of conscience and religious liberty in her state with the excuse that the measure could have been misused as an instrument of discrimination ("Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoes controversial religious freedom bill," Web, Feb. 26).
It seems to me that we have been conditioned to think of all discrimination as bad. But is it?
I can remember when a discriminating shopper was one who had certain standards and would only buy products that met those standards. Is that type of discrimination bad?
When a man marries a woman, he publicly promises that in certain areas of life he will discriminate in favor of that one woman and against all other women. Likewise the woman promises that in those same areas of life she will discriminate in favor of that one man and against all other men. Is this type of discrimination bad?
The claim that laws should not be instruments of discrimination reveals a remarkable lack of insight. Laws by their very nature are instruments of discrimination. Any law on the books discriminates in favor of one type of behavior and against another type of behavior.
Laws against theft discriminate against stealing, and they discriminate in favor of respecting people's property rights. Is this type of discrimination bad? Laws against murder discriminate against taking the life of a human being without due process of law, and discriminate in favor of respecting a person's right to live. Is this type of discrimination bad?
The real question ought to be, What should or should not be discriminated against, and why?
THOMAS M. CRAWFORD
About the Author
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reject any legislation dubbed 'comprehensive'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Media are complicit in Hamas' tactics
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gazans should help defeat Hamas
- EDITORIAL: The impeachment trap
- EDITORIAL: Illegal aliens in the shadows? What shadows?
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- MSNBC's Ronan Farrow questions lack of racial diversity in emoji characters
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Obama vows veto of House border bill
- ISTOOK: Get ready for super-priced burgers due to NLRB decree