Virginia has history of opposition to public aid

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) - In pushing for a large scale expansion of Medicaid eligibility, Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe isn’t just up against House Republicans who are leery of supporting a key aspect of President Obama’s signature health care law. He’s also trying to upend the commonwealth’s long tradition of resistance to public aid.

Virginia state Sen. Charles J. Colgan, a Prince William County Democrat who was first elected nearly four decades ago, remembers former Gov. John Dalton voicing concerns in the late ‘70s about the state’s growing Medicaid budget.

Dalton was worried that state spending on the publicly funded health care program for the poor and disabled would grow to a point where it was same size as the rest of the state’s budget, Colgan said.

Today, similar concerns are raised nearly every day by Republicans in the House of Delegates opposed a plan by Senate Democrats and McAuliffe to expand Medicaid eligibility to nearly 400,000 Virginians.

“It goes back so far,” said Colgan of Virginia’s fight over Medicaid spending.

Under the Affordable Care Act, the federal government has promised to cover the entire cost of Virginia’s state’s expanded Medicaid population through 2016, and no less than 90 percent of the cost in future years. States can choose whether to expand Medicaid. Most Republicans in Virginia and elsewhere, however, argue that federal government won’t be able to afford its promise and could shift costs back to the states.

For several decades in Virginia, regardless of which party has been in power and despite the commonwealth’s overall affluence, the default setting has been skepticism toward public assistance of all kinds, including Medicaid.

When Colgan was first elected, Virginia was one of 22 states to prohibit welfare payments to families with an able-bodied but unemployed father. In 1998, Gov. Jim Gilmore vetoed a bipartisan plan to expand Medicaid to lower income children, saying the proposal “affronts my philosophy” and created dependency on the government.

“The fight over Medicaid expansion and the hesitation to move in the direction of Medicaid expansion is something that has very deep roots in Virginia political culture,” said Stephen Farnsworth, a political science professor at Mary Washington University.

Virginia currently has some of the most restrictive Medicaid eligibility requirements in the country. The commonwealth ranked 48th in state Medicaid spending per capita, according to a report from the state’s Medicaid office last year.

Non-disabled adults without minor children cannot qualify for Medicaid, no matter how poor they are. If Medicaid expansion passed, the state estimates this group of adults - with incomes up to about $16,000 a year - would account for about 70 percent of newly eligible enrollees.

Supporters of Virginia’s wary approach to public assistance say keeping the state’s safety net small helps ensure it will always be available for those who need it most, like the infirm or disabled.

But McAuliffe and his supporters are hoping the state is ready to abandon that tradition in favor of what they say is a more compassionate approach that recognizes that fewer employers are offering health insurance to low-income workers.

And those in favor of an expanding Medicaid eligibility are counting on federal assistance to help change minds. The state’s budget office said that with Medicaid expansion, the new federal health care law would save the state $1 billion through 2022.

“It’s common sense, morally, socially and economically,” said McAuliffe.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks