- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
Kansas Senate OKs ‘compromise’ judiciary budget
Question of the Day
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) - The Senate’s approval of a bill that funds the Kansas judicial branch means furloughs are less likely, a top Republican supporter said, but Democrats are crying foul because of several strings attached - including two measures to decentralize the power of the state Supreme Court.
In a 23-12 vote Thursday, a day before the Kansas Supreme Court handed down the much-anticipated school funding decision, the Kansas Senate approved an omnibus bill containing five judicial measures, The Topeka Capital-Journal (http://bit.ly/O17PmY ) reported.
“If we pass this bill, Mr. Chairman, the courts of Kansas will be allowed to remain open for business,” the Independence Republican said.
Passing the budget before Friday’s school funding decision sent a strong message that the Senate decides the judiciary budget based on what the courts need, rather than on any court decisions, King said.
In addition to funding courts, Senate Substitute for House Bill 2338 also would increase docket fees on some large litigation, allow some judicial positions to remain open for 120 days to save money and allow the chief judges of the state’s 31 judicial districts to take control of their individual budgets from the Kansas Supreme Court.
It also would let judicial districts to elect their own chiefs, instead of the current process of Supreme Court appointments.
Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, a Topeka Democrat, said the bill was meant to force those who have long favored increasing the judicial budget into a position to vote “no” because of its add-ons.
“This bill is unprecedented,” said Hensley, the Legislature’s longest-serving member.
King said the bill was not unique and cited policy provisions tied to salary increases within the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
“This has been done,” he said.
Information from: The Topeka (Kan.) Capital-Journal, http://www.cjonline.com
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq