Appel said he had a philosophical problem with the inclusion of an automatic growth factor in the formula that could lock the Legislature into boosting the per-student payment by 2.75 percent annually in later years.
“I’m just fundamentally against the concept that there’s a mandatory increase imposed upon the Legislature,” he said.
Lawmakers can approve or reject the formula submitted each year by BESE, but cannot change it. If the education board and lawmakers can’t agree on a new formula, the state would continue using the current financing structure to pay for public schools in the 2014-15 year.
State Superintendent of Education John White defended the recommendations.
“We look forward to talking with legislative leadership about whether the legislature can support a formula proposal this year,” he said in a statement.
BESE President Chas Roemer said the formula proposed by the education board was “developed through the input of a diverse group of education stakeholders and the careful consideration of local school district needs.”
In a statement, Roemer added: “We also appreciate the chairman’s concerns and will consider them as we move forward.”
The recommendations BESE submitted to lawmakers in March would increase spending in the financing formula by about $150 million.
Of the increases, $70 million of that would simply roll into the permanent formula an increase that lawmakers gave to school districts this year. Another $40 million is tied to increased student enrollment. And $20 million was required to address local tax changes.
Only about $15 million of the increased funding would expand spending on programs, including for career education courses and special education.
The budget bill awaiting debate in the House contained the money to pay for BESE’s proposal. But if lawmakers want to fund the new initiatives, they could pay for those items outside of the financing formula.
Opponents of BESE’s recommendations listed multiple complaints.