Judge dismisses case against SC Speaker Harrell

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) - A judge on Monday dismissed allegations of corruption against House Speaker Bobby Harrell, ruling such a case must first be considered by a legislative panel before state prosecutors could touch it and saying a State Grand Jury was improperly empaneled.

State prosecutors vowed to appeal the ruling, which Harrell said was a victory in a “politically driven” pursuit.

Circuit Judge Casey Manning’s decision to send the Harrell case to the Legislature is similar to one he previously made regarding ethics allegations against Gov. Nikki Haley, a former House member.

The State Grand Jury had been considering whether Harrell, ahe powerful Charleston Republican, should be indicted on allegations he used his influence for personal benefit, including obtaining a permit for his pharmaceutical business and appointing his brother to a judicial candidate screening committee.

Ashley Landess of the South Carolina Policy Council, a libertarian-leaning think tank, brought the allegations to Attorney General Alan Wilson. The Republican prosecutor forwarded the matter to the State Law Enforcement Division and had been in the process of presenting those secret findings to the State Grand Jury.

Two public hearings were held, with Harrell’s attorneys first arguing Wilson had tried to intimidate their client into supporting certain legislation, which Wilson denied. Subsequently, the speaker’s lawyers said the whole matter should be taken out of the court system and dealt with instead by the House Ethics Committee, a legislative body empaneled to hear complaints against its own members.

In his ruling, Manning said state law requires the ethics panel to be the first to consider such a case anyway, saying it was improper to take the issue to the State Grand Jury right away.

“Until the South Carolina House of Representatives Ethics Committee has either referred the matter to Attorney General Wilson or has otherwise acted on the complaint, exclusive jurisdiction resides solely within the South Carolina House of Representatives Ethics Committee,” Manning wrote, saying the matter was “solely within the purview” of that panel.

Wilson has said the Harrell matter is criminal and therefore must be dealt with in court. In an email statement, Wilson said he planned to appeal.

“We believe today’s order of Judge Manning is without any foundation or support in the law,” Wilson said.

In Haley’s case, in 2011, Republican activist John Rainey sued the GOP governor, accusing her of improper lobbying while working as a hospital fundraiser and for a highway engineering firm while representing Lexington in the House.

Manning ruled the matter should be dealt with by House Ethics. Rainey lodged a parallel complaint with that panel, which ultimately cleared Haley of all allegations, and lost an appeal.

In court, Wilson said the Rainey case was different because that matter was entirely civil and initiated by a private citizen. The Harrell case - while technically flagged to prosecutors’ attention by Landess, a private individual - rose to a criminal level, with Wilson, SLED and the State Grand Jury all being involved.

In a statement, Harrell repeated his request to release the SLED report and said the case “reeks of politics.”

“The constitution and state statutes are clear on these issues,” Harrell said. “Rather than discussing the merits of the case, the Attorney General continues to play politics.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks