- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: VA scandal shows ‘single-payer’ dangers
Question of the Day
The Veterans Affairs medical center scandal is a perfect example of single-payer, rationed health care (“Veterans die while a traitor gets VIP health care,” Web, May 5). Unfortunately, the most vocal supporters, such as New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, will never get to experience it. VA health care is also a perfect example of consensus, best-practice health care, as determined by a panel of experts.
When you centralize power in the few to govern the many, do you really think that you will be better off in the long run? A perfect example of this has emanated from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and from Obamacare, not to mention the U.S. Department of Agriculture, over the past 50 years.
The efforts of these entities have resulted in a wholesale re-engineering of the U.S. food supply. Investigative journalist Nina Teicholz has finally carried out a thorough review of the research concerning the role of saturated fat in coronary heart disease, and found that it was inconsistent, sloppy and with few exceptions failed to support the famous diet-heart disease hypothesis of Ancel Keys.
Keys was an ideologue, much like Al Gore, and he was in the driver’s seat at the American Heart Association AHA). If you weren’t a believer in his theories, then you merited derision and banishment. Sound familiar? Think “climate science.” Scientists who had different opinions had their funding cut by NIH and their ability to publish severely curtailed. This is corruption in science, and it ran deep in both NIH and the AHA.
So how has it worked out? The U.S. population took the advice, and 11 percent of the population is now experiencing Type 2 diabetes. Metabolic syndrome is now epidemic. Obesity can be seen in half the U.S. population, with all of the ills that go with it.
If you think your health care, much less your health, is going to be improved by a panel of experts residing at the AHA or NIH, maybe your heirs will be better served if you just make the payment on your life-insurance premiums.
About the Author
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reject any legislation dubbed 'comprehensive'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Media are complicit in Hamas' tactics
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gazans should help defeat Hamas
- EDITORIAL: The impeachment trap
- EDITORIAL: Illegal aliens in the shadows? What shadows?
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- McCLAUGHRY: Finish off the "Islamic State" quickly and cheaply
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job