- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
UN watchdog: Peacekeepers almost never used force
Question of the Day
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - U.N. peacekeeping forces responded immediately to only a minority of attacks on civilians and almost never used force to protect them when they did respond, the U.N.’s internal watchdog said.
The Office of Internal Oversight Services said only 20 percent of the 507 attacks reported by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon between 2010 and 2013 led to an immediate response by eight U.N. peacekeeping missions with a mandate to protect civilians that it evaluated.
“In most cases, mission personnel were not on site at the time of the attack and did not reach the site during the attack,” OIOS said in a report to the General Assembly this week. “Where mission personnel … actually were on site at the time of an attack or threatened attack against civilians, force was almost never used.”
U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous expressed regret Friday that the report focused “solely on the last resort - the use of force” and not comprehensive political solutions which “must always be paramount.”
He also expressed regret that the study did not highlight the central role of the nations where U.N. peacekeepers are deployed in protecting their own civilians.
“The (U.N.) blue helmets can provide breathing space for a fragile peace process to take hold, but they cannot substitute for the fundamental requirements of the institutions of a functioning state,” Ladsous said.
The OIOS report said the rate of response by U.N. peacekeepers to attacks on civilians varied across missions, reflecting the seriousness of the incidents, early warning, accessibility to the site, and other factors.
The highest rate of response - 68 percent - was by the U.N. mission in Abyei, an oil-rich region contested by Sudan and South Sudan, followed by a 26 percent response in Congo. The lowest levels - less than 10 percent - were in Haiti and South Sudan, it said.
Instead of using force to protect civilians, OIOS said, peacekeepers responded by supporting local security forces, securing areas and facilities, evacuating civilians to safety, sheltering them on U.N. premises and launching human rights investigations.
The report identified several factors that contribute to the non-use of force in peacekeeping, including different views in the U.N. Security Council and countries that contribute troops to U.N. peacekeeping missions on the use of force and a de facto “dual line of command” exercised by troop-contributing countries over their soldiers in peacekeeping missions.
TWT Video Picks
Retailer pays a price for getting too close to Obama
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Latest Obama claim: I don't learn anything from the news
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Tom Petty: 'No one's got Christ more wrong than the Christians'
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Two Ukrainian fighter jets shot down
- HURT: The cost of 'free' water in Detroit
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq