- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Judge denies motion to dismiss corruption charges against McDonnells
Question of the Day
A federal judge on Tuesday denied motions to dismiss most of the corruption charges against former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell and his wife and rejected requests the couple be tried separately, leaving the McDonnells with precious few legal options ahead of a scheduled trial date in late July.
The couple will be tried together — limiting their options to either blame or try to exonerate one another — and a federal judge appeared unmoved by a push from Mr. McDonnell’s legal team to narrowly define what constitutes an “official act” from the governor in exchange for goods or services.
“Whether Defendants’ conduct in fact constituted ‘the corruption of official positions through misuse of influence in governmental decision-making’ is a question for the jury based on the evidence adduced at trial,” Judge James R. Spencer wrote Tuesday in his order denying motions to dismiss.
That means, absent a plea deal, the former governor and his wife, Maureen, are set to face a July 28 jury trial after a 14-count federal indictment was handed down in January saying former health supplement company executive Jonnie R. Williams Sr. supplied the McDonnells with gifts and loans and, in return, received access in order to peddle his products.
The former governor and his wife, who faces similar criminal counts, have pleaded not guilty to charges that stem from accepting, among other things, $15,000 for catering at their daughter’s wedding, an engraved $6,500 Rolex watch and a New York City shopping spree. Mr. McDonnell has said the gifts were motivated by friendship and that the family has repaid them.
Prosecutors have argued that, in context, the fact that Mr. McDonnell was involved with setting up meetings could constitute official acts and that the McDonnells were secretly receiving gifts while organizing them.
Judge Spencer also denied motions to grant the McDonnells separate trials.
Mrs. McDonnell’s attorneys said she could deliver testimony to help exonerate her husband at a separate trial that she could not if the couple is tried together, but Judge Spencer said that the defendants failed to meet their burden to show a joint trial will result in a miscarriage of justice or prevent Mr. McDonnell from receiving a fair trial.
The McDonnells have also been charged with making false statements to banks.
From the start, Mr. McDonnell’s lawyers have argued that federal prosecutors were using an “extralegal” interpretation of state law in order to bring their charges.
They also drew on last month’s McCutcheon v. FEC Supreme Court decision, which voided the overall federal limit on individuals’ campaign contributions, and the landmark 2010 Citizens United decision that lifted restrictions on independent political spending to suggest the court employ a significantly narrower definition of political corruption than was used by prosecutors.
The notion of prosecutorial overreach was also broached in a proposed court filing last month by five former Virginia attorneys general, Democrat and Republican, though the filing was ultimately rejected.
The memo, submitted for the judge’s consideration as a friend of the court brief, said the corruption charges against Mr. McDonnell, a Republican, rely on an “expansive interpretation” of federal law and are alien to any advice they would offer a governor of Virginia. They said such an interpretation creates the possibility of federal prosecution for “normal participation in the democratic process.”
Attorneys also moved to strike a portion of the indictment related to Mrs. McDonnell’s purchase and transfer of Star Scientific stock and alleged efforts to avoid the state’s financial disclosure requirements — a move that was denied.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Williams: First lady didn't discuss her relationship with husband
- Williams: Maureen McDonnell's high-dollar requests seemed excessive
- Trips, loans for McDonnell family detailed at trial
- Star witness in Bob McDonnell corruption trial refutes 'crush' defense
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell's wife had 'crush' on CEO
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- House backs faster deportations, cancels 'Dreamer' policy
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors