The Republican-controlled House on Thursday overwhelmingly backed a $601 billion defense authorization bill that rebuffs Pentagon plans to retire Cold War-era aircraft, take ships out of commission and increase out-of-pocket costs for personnel. The vote was 325-98.
The end of two wars means smaller defense budgets and the Pentagon had come up with its cost-saving plans. Republicans and Democrats buckled under election-year pressure and balked at the cuts, especially for programs in their home states that mean hundreds of thousands of jobs.
On the other side of the Capitol, the Senate Armed Services Committee wrapped up work on its version of the defense bill. Republicans and Democrats were more receptive to several of the Pentagon proposals, agreeing with military leaders that saving some weapons would undercut readiness.
The Senate committee’s bill costs $514 billion. Unlike the House, the panel didn’t include a placeholder of $79.4 billion for the war in Afghanistan and other overseas operations as it awaits word from the Obama administration on the exact cost.
Some highlights of the bills:
HANDLING SUSPECTS AT GUANTANAMO
Congress repeatedly has thwarted President Barack Obama’s efforts to close the U.S. naval installation at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that currently houses 154 terror suspects. The Senate Armed Services Committee may have given Obama his first real chance to shutter the facility.
The committee’s bill “created a path to close Guantanamo,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the panel’s chairman. Under the proposal, the administration would have to present a comprehensive plan to Congress on how to close the facility and transfer terror suspects. Both houses of Congress could back a joint resolution of disapproval, but the president would have the opportunity to veto the resolution.
The House bill continues the prohibition on transferring terror suspects to maximum-security prisons in the United States.
MILITARY SEXUAL ASSAULT
The bills would change the military rules of evidence to prohibit an accused service member from using good military character as defense in court-martial proceedings unless it was directly relevant to the alleged crime.