Editorials from around Pennsylvania

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Editorials from around Pennsylvania:

___

STIFFING VETS NOT NEW

When the Continental Army was discharged in 1781, the new government of the United States didn’t bother paying the soldiers who had defeated the greatest power on the planet. Two years later, former soldiers from Pennsylvania marched on the Capitol in Philadelphia and demanded their pay, prompting the Congress to flee to Princeton, New Jersey. A few weeks later, the U.S. Army forced the protesters out of the capital.

But that was just the beginning of the government reneging on promises to veterans. The current situation, in which veterans face long waiting periods for access to health care, is only the latest example.

In 1924, President Calvin Coolidge vetoed a bill proposing a special bonus for World War I veterans, declaring that “patriotism bought and paid for is not patriotism.” Congress disagreed and overrode the veto, authorizing bonuses to be paid over several years.

The Great Depression intervened and ceased those payments, however. After thousands of World War I veterans marched on the Capitol in the summer of 1932, occupied some buildings and built a camp on the National Mall, President Herbert Hoover ordered the Army to clear them out. Troops under the command of Gen. Douglas MacArthur, including a tank unit, did exactly that.

Ideally, the current problem will be the last regarding unkept promises to veterans. First, Congress and the administration should do whatever is necessary to ensure that veterans get the health care they need. Then, before rushing into a needless war like that in Iraq, lawmakers and the president should estimate the long-term costs of its consequences for the soldiers whom they place in harm’s way.

- (Pottsville) Republican Herald

___

CORBETT‘S CALL: THE GOVERNOR MUST ACT ON UPMC-HIGHMARK

Last week, state senators in Pittsburgh heard more testimony on the coming separation of UPMC and Highmark. The time for talk, though, is over. Gov. Tom Corbett needs to act.

As just about everyone knows, most Highmark customers will lose their in-network access to most UPMC facilities beginning Jan. 1. This will be a tectonic shift for people in Western Pennsylvania.

Highmark, the region’s largest health care insurer, and UPMC, the largest health care provider, have had contracts for decades that provide easy entry for Highmark customers. The landscape changed, however, when Highmark jumped into the hospital business last year by acquiring the West Penn Allegheny Health System and relaunching it as the Allegheny Health Network.

UPMC took it as an opportunity to declare, essentially, that it will close its doors Jan. 1 to most Highmark policy holders. In the meantime, UPMC is steering them toward other insurance policies, including its own UPMC Health Plan, so they can maintain access to UPMC physicians and facilities. (Many Highmark customers can’t change plans, however, because their insurance is determined by their employer.)

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks