- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
EDITORIAL: Tempting Mount Everest
Nature can be cruel to the brave who challenge the mountain above all others
Question of the Day
The majestic mountain that rises above all others has once more conquered its suitors. Mount Everest — attainable by only a fortunate few — has rebuffed a season of climbers who would risk life and limb to take a "selfie" on its glistening summit.
The locals say the gods who animate the forces of nature in the Himalayas are angry. Others blame the misfortune on "global warming." The element of danger, though, is part of the lure that keeps adventurers coming back to test their mettle on the mountain.
The world's highest peak claimed a fresh brace of victims last month when about 30 guides found themselves in the path of falling ice blocks the size of houses that broke loose as the climbers passed through the Khumbu Icefall just above a climbers' camp at 18,000 feet. The avalanche killed 13 Sherpas, and three more are missing. It was the deadliest day in nearly a century of Everest climbing.
Nepal's authorities have not closed the mountain, but the Sherpa guides have refused to assist the three-dozen commercial expeditions that were all set to lead wealthy clients to the top. They claim the avalanche is a sign that the gods are displeased. Those more attuned to secular forces blame the tragedy on a purported planetary warm-up, which now goes by the meaningless euphemism "climate change." If ever there was a place where the climate changes without warning, as it has for millennia, it's Everest.
Although this spring's tragedy was the worst ever, the peak the locals call Sagarmatha has killed more than 264 climbers without any help from global warming. Most notable was the disaster of 1996, when eight froze to death when a rogue blizzard caught them unexpectedly near the summit of the 29,029-foot mountain, a tragedy recounted in John Krakauer's book, "Into Thin Air." That killer storm occurred before global warming began the "pause" that is now 17 years long.
The Sherpas say the Khumbu glacier, which spawns the ice-chunk field that climbers must traverse, has become less stable despite the warming hiatus, and warn that future hikers might be clambering over bare rock rather than snow on their way to the summit. Their fear, though, is rooted in a report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which predicted in 2007 that 80 percent of Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035. That forecast was found to be wildly exaggerated, forcing the resignation of panel chairman Rajendra Pachauri.
Climate scientists, who rely on computer models to predict temperature patterns, have fallen into the same crevasse as other crystal-ball readers whose forecasts never come true. Despite warnings about warming conditions on Everest, hikers won't be tempted soon to climb to the top in tennis shoes and shorts.
When a reporter once asked British explorer George Mallory why reaching the summit was so important to him, he famously replied: "Because it's there." He died during his 1924 attempt, but inspired countless others to try the thrill of cheating death. Everest will be there next year, and the years after that, and the tragedy of 2014 will only add to the attraction of the view from "the roof of the world."
About the Author
- 'Standing by Israel' special report
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ventura's court win is really a loss
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ukraine is not so easily understood
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reagan didn't deregulate airlines
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Don't fund irrelevant 'highway' projects
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
Get Breaking Alerts
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Sarah Palin's online channel hits snag as Stephen Colbert buys similar URL
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- House votes to sue President Obama over claims of presidential power
- EDITORIAL: Pols' misrepresentations fuel public's cynicism about politics
- EDITORIAL: 'Operation Choke Point': A noose for business
- EDITORIAL: For too many gays, 'tolerance' is a one-way street
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- EDITORIAL: Meriam Ibrahim's happy immigrant story