- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
- Friend of bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev found guilty of impeding probe
- Train with MH17 plane crash bodies leaves rebel town in Ukraine
- Half of Colorado voters are OK with Hobby Lobby decision, poll shows
- HIV-killing condom to soon hit shelves in Australia
- Estonia pulls plug on Steven Seagal over praise for Putin
- Lawyer: Pelvic exam pics cost Hopkins $190 million
Over conservative protests, women’s museum advances
Question of the Day
The “war on women” turned into a war between women on Wednesday when the House passed legislation that paves the way for a Women’s National History Museum in the nation’s capital.
The bipartisan bill passed 383-33, but not without protest from conservative lawmakers and outside groups such as Concerned Women for America, who object to the scope and collection of the project.
Organizers “glorify Margaret Sanger who founded Planned Parenthood and neglected to mention she was a eugenicist and very racist in her beliefs,” explained Penny Nance, President and CEO of Concerned Women for America. “They didn’t mention on the website Jeane Kirkpatrick who served under President Ronald Reagan and was very conservative and brought down the Soviet Union.”
Rep. Michele Bachmann, Minnesota Republican, warned the museum concept “will enshrine the radical feminist movement.”
The bill, sponsored by Reps. Carolyn Maloney, New York Democrat, and Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee Republican, that would allow a commission to be formed that would locate a site for the museum, decide if it should be part of the Smithsonian Institution and plan the funding for the museum.
Ms. Blackburn told the Washington Times that the legislation ensures that a National Women’s History Museum honors the contribution from conservative women without spending one dime of taxpayer money, saying “additional safeguards” have been put into the legislation to ensure ideological balance.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Originally from Texas, Alex Swoyer left the Lone Star State to attend the Missouri School of Journalism where she graduated with a bachelor’s degree in journalism with an emphasis in broadcast.
She has experience covering stories in the mid-Missouri, Houston and southwest Florida areas where she worked at local affiliate TV stations and received a First Place Mark of Excellence ...
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- More immigrants deported from New Mexico center
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Ron Paul: U.S. partly to blame for Malaysia Airlines disaster
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Pro-Russia rebel commander suggests passengers died days before Malaysian flight
- Vladimir Putin pressured to aid Ukraine plane crash probe, rein in rebels
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq