- Beretta leaves Maryland over gun laws, heads for Tennessee
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
Closed Kewaunee plant seeks safety exemptions
Question of the Day
CARLTON, Wis. (AP) - The owner of the shuttered Kewaunee Power Station is seeking an exemption to federal safety rules that it says are outdated and overly conservative, but five U.S. senators say the rules governing storage of nuclear material should be maintained.
Dominion Resources Inc. shut down the Kewaunee nuclear plant last year. The spent fuel rods will be placed in storage in 2016.
Federal regulations say an emergency protection zone needs to be maintained up to 50 miles around the storage site. But Kewaunee spokesman Mark Kanz said that rule overstates the possible dangers, Press-Gazette Media reported (http://gbpg.net/1j3DAcU ).
“What we are looking for is a waiver for requirements that really no longer are applicable,” Kanz said. He said a Dominion analysis showed that after about 17 months of treatment, spent nuclear fuel has limited impact onsite and no impact offsite.
Federal law requires that the U.S. government provide a national repository for spent fuel, but that hasn’t happened yet, and it’s not clear whether that will move forward. In the meantime Dominion is providing onsite security as long as fuel is stored there, Kanz said.
Three other nuclear plants, in California, Florida and Vermont, are also seeking safety exemptions from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. But five senators - four Democrats and a left-leaning Independent - say the exemption requests should be denied.
The senators - Edward Markey of Massachusetts, Barbara Boxer of California, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and Bernard Sanders and Patrick Leahy of Vermont - argue that the safety rules are in place for a reason.
The senators wrote to the regulatory commission citing studies from the National Academy of Sciences and the NRC itself, which determined that draining a pool of spent nuclear fuel can lead to fires, radioactive releases and widespread contamination. Given risks such as a potential terrorist attack, the current regulations should remain in full force, they said.
Information from: Press-Gazette Media, http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com
TWT Video Picks
The president could pay the full price for ignoring Congress
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Gen. James Amos, Marine Corps commandant, slams Obama's handling of Iraq
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq