- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Nebraska court: Man must stay away from ConAgra
Question of the Day
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) - A man charged with shooting at window washers outside food company ConAgra’s headquarters in Omaha in 2012, and later acquitted, must stay away from the company’s property, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled Friday.
In late 2012, Douglas County Court granted ConAgra a temporary restraining order against Ryan Zimmerman, who had been charged with several felonies in the Nov. 10, 2012 shooting outside the ConAgra building, where his estranged wife worked. No one was injured in the shooting, and Zimmerman was acquitted by a jury in August of the charges after his attorneys were able to raise doubts about witness testimony.
In a 4-2 decision Friday with one justice not participating, the Nebraska Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s ruling, ordering it to issue the one-year injunction against Zimmerman. The majority reasoned that the lower court was wrong to exclude evidence of Zimmerman’s lengthy criminal history, reports showing he had harassed his wife at ConAgra and of protection orders issued to keep Zimmerman away from his wife.
That evidence provides “relevant connection between the past actions of Zimmerman and the likelihood he will trespass again, while also demonstrating his flagrant disregard for the criminal law,” Nebraska Supreme Court Justice Michael McCormack wrote for the majority.
In a dissent, Justices William Cassel and Kenneth Stephan said the majority opinion goes against more than 100 years of court precedent and wrongly speculates that Zimmerman will commit a crime on ConAgra property. They also said that ConAgra, as a large and successful corporation, was getting special treatment as a result of the Supreme Court ruling.
ConAgra has already issued a letter to Zimmerman barring him from being on ConAgra property and can be arrested for criminal trespass if he does, the dissent said. State law provides restraining orders for victims of domestic abuse or harassment, it said.
Zimmerman’s attorney, Michael Wilson, said it’s unclear from the opinion whether the one-year extension becomes effective this year or will commence from the date of the lower court’s original order - making it moot, as a year has already passed since then.
Dan Hare, a spokesman for ConAgra, said the company is pleased with the majority opinion.
“We are committed to maintaining a safe work environment for our employees,” Hare said.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq