- - Sunday, June 21, 2015

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Who’s hiding what, and in whose pantry? American farmers and food processors usually take a lot of pride in what they grow and package, and where they grow and package it — whether jams and jellies from Oregon, prime beef from Texas and Colorado, tacos from New Mexico, fish from New England, peanut butter “proudly made in Arkansas,” and fruits and nuts from California’s San Joaquin Valley. It’s often right on the label.

Foreign growers and packers, not so much. Sometimes they don’t want the shopper to know where it comes from. This week the World Trade Organization is expected to uphold Canadian and Mexican complaints that U.S. laws requiring a label of origin are discriminatory. These across-the-border neighbors complain that such labeling is needlessly expensive, unnecessary when there’s such heavy traffic in livestock at different stages of marketing moving back and forth across the border, and it gives American producers unfair advantage in violation of North American trade pacts. Anticipating billions of dollars in awards on these complaints, the House of Representatives has voted to remove country of origin requirements on beef, pork and chicken. Senate hearings are scheduled next week to take up the legislation there.

Complicated arguments make it difficult for supermarket shoppers to know where the ordinary customer’s best interests lie. Striking down any part of the labeling is an important skirmish in the war between consumers and the agro-industrial complex.

Processed foods do not require country of origin labeling, particularly if the food is repackaged once it arrives in the United States. With imports of processed foods rising steadily rate, there’s concern that much of this rising volume originates in China, which does not always meet American standards.

Given the pollution of the Chinese environment — official Chinese government statements reveal that more than half of the water in China is polluted, for example — these imports could be a disaster waiting to happen. American importers insist that their standards are being met in Chinese processing, but this requires at least a small leap of faith.

An earlier episode is worth recalling. In March 2007 kidney failure in dogs and cats was traced to ingredients in pet food from a Chinese company, killing at least 3,600 animals. There’s no central reporting of animal deaths in China, but there are estimates that the deaths of pets traced to contaminated Chinese ingredients could run to many thousands.

At that time, Chinese protein exports to the United States for human consumption were brought under inspection. Officials of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Department of Agriculture said between 2.5 and 3 million people in the United States had consumed chickens that had eaten feed containing contaminated vegetable protein from China. Nevertheless, U.S. food safety officials assured the public that “there is very low risk to human health from consuming meat from hogs and chickens known to have been fed animal feed supplemented with pet food scraps that contained melamine and melamine-related compounds.”

Since then, Chinese levels of pollution have continued to rise, with weekly reports even in the closely controlled Chinese media of food contamination scandals. The general problem of air, water and ground pollution is finally being addressed by the Beijing government, though it is not clear how effective this will be.

Retreating from labeling the country of origin of food sold in the United States, however argued for economic reasons, is a cause for concern. Further identifying the country of origin of all foodstuffs, raw or processed, is the best way to help a careful consumer to protect his or her family. Everybody has to eat.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide