The Washington Times

Letters

Recent Articles
  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Why Benghazi matters

    By - The Washington Times

    Some in the press dismiss the Benghazi congressional investigation as mere partisan politics. Their audience needs to know what this is really about. Published May 21, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Peace is guns in the right hands

    By - The Washington Times

    On Memorial Day, we all have a chance to remember the real peace marchers of the world. Published May 21, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Nullifying unconstitutional governance

    By - The Washington Times

    I do not know Jeffrey Scott Shapiro ("Another attempt at nullification," Commentary, May 13), but it is quite obvious that he does not understand the process of nullification. I would attribute that to the fact that the subject of nullification is not being taught today, not even in our law schools. Published May 20, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Woods, Doherty saved lives by ignoring orders

    By - The Washington Times

    The drip, drip, drip of Benghazi makes it easy to forget key elements of the story, learned months ago. Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed defending the occupants of the Benghazi mission in Libya. They were killed because they disregarded orders to "stand down." They were killed because they assumed help was on the way. They used a laser to illuminate a mortar position that was attacking the compound and exposed themselves to targeted fire. The help never came. Published May 20, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The true cost of biofuels

    By - The Washington Times

    The U.S. Army has recently purchased a large quantity of biofuel-derived jet fuel at a cost of $59 per gallon — in spite of our financial crisis. The insanity of biofuel advocates lingers on like a bad case of the flu that people just cannot shake. Published May 20, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Petraeus' payback?

    By - The Washington Times

    President Obama is the most vindictive, thin-skinned president we have ever had. Does anyone want to take a bet that then-CIA chief David H. Petraeus' sex-scandal downfall is punishment for him not falling in line completely with the much-revised Benghazi talking points of the White House? Around Sept. 20, Mr. Petraeus disputed the revised version of the talking points. On Nov. 7, the story of his affair came out. Published May 17, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The great Hawking boycott irony

    By - The Washington Times

    If Stephen Hawking, as a scientist, wants to be logical in his boycott of anything associated with Israeli technology, including conferences that are being held in Israel, then he should extend his efforts to banning the use of Israeli developments and products ("Why Stephen Hawking's Israel boycott matters," Web, May 11). Unfortunately, such an action would render his ability to communicate almost nil. Published May 17, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: IRS scandal proves need to scrap code

    By - The Washington Times

    Just in case further evidence is needed of the damage done to our nation and our hapless people by the Internal Revenue Service, it comes through the news that at some level or levels the terror-inspiring institution targeted Tea Party and related groups for scrutiny and investigation ("Holder: IRS probe will be national, 'dispassionate,'" Web, May 15). This phenomenon should be alarming to the American people, regardless of one's political stripes. Published May 17, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Benghazi victims never forgotten

    By - The Washington Times

    Liberals call patriotic Americans partisan, political Obama-haters who are trying to tear our government apart over Benghazi. Yet four Americans, pleading for help to no avail, were savagely slain on American soil in Libya by Islamist terrorists — and they not only got abandoned, the responsible parties in the White House and State Department totally lied and tried to cover up what actually happened there on Sept. 11, 2012. Published May 17, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Legal path is the right choice

    By - The Washington Times

    Angie Gonzalez decries the possibility that her family may be broken up if her husband is deported ("Inside the Beltway," May 9). Mrs. Gonzalez speaks as though she has no choice, but she does. She can keep her family together by returning with all her family members to her home country. They could then set a wonderful example for the children about determination, persistence and honesty in pursuing a goal by returning to the United States legally so that the entire family may enjoy, without fear of deportation, all America has to offer. Published May 17, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: IRS scheme a distraction from Benghazi?

    By - The Washington Times

    The morning news report had competing stories about Benghazi and the Internal Revenue Service's slap-down of conservative nonprofits. My wife, confused, asked me how the two stories were related. I told her they weren't. Later, after thinking about it, I realized that they are indeed related. Published May 16, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Influence culture to lower homicide rates

    By - The Washington Times

    Reducing homicides and saving a few billion dollars in the process is not that difficult. Killing is a learned behavior, just like buying cars, using toilet paper and typing on computers. Published May 16, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: IRS witch hunt goes deep

    By - The Washington Times

    My husband and I have been small-business owners since 1983. In September 2010, we were audited by the Internal Revenue Service. The auditor told us that it would take one week to receive their findings. It wasn't until February 2012, a year-and-a-half later, that we received a letter stating that we owed the IRS money ("Boehner on IRS: 'Who's going to jail over this scandal?'" Web, May 15). Published May 16, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: IRS scandal is no low-level job

    By - The Washington Times

    President Obama once famously told his supporters about political opponents, "If they bring a knife to the fight, you bring a gun." The gun turned out to be the Internal Revenue Service ("Outraged GOP: It's time to audit the IRS; targeting of conservative groups called 'chilling,'" Web, May 12). Published May 16, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gun control a state issue

    By - The Washington Times

    It's time to set things straight on gun control laws, states' rights and the Constitution. It is my opinion that this debate is going nowhere because some key facts have been overlooked ("Another attempt at nullification," Commentary, May 14). Published May 15, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Benghazi facilities should have been closed

    By - The Washington Times

    The accountability report by former Ambassador Thomas Pickering and retired chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen was grossly inadequate ("McCain senses Benghazi 'cover-up,' wants more Clinton testimony," Web, May 12). The two men concluded those responsible for the Benghazi murders were low-level State Department staff; they totally ignored the basic problem of why the Benghazi facilities remained open. Published May 15, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Let U.S. minerals shine

    By - The Washington Times

    Susan Crabtree's article, "Obama touts improving jobs figures in economic speech in Texas" (Web, May 9) reports that during his "Middle Class Jobs and Opportunity Tour" the president hopes to build support for spending a billion dollars on job-growth programs. We in the mining sector propose an alternative opportunity that doesn't require government funding: streamlining America's permitting process so that the rich resources we have here at home are available to supply the needs of U.S. manufacturers. The "National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2013" of Rep. Mark E. Amodei, Nevada Republican, would do just that. Published May 15, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Benghazi nonresponse is impeachable offense

    By - The Washington Times

    We've seen then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton ask, with what seemed like feigned exasperation "What difference, at this point, does it make?" when asked about the State Department's talking points mischaracterizing the Benghazi, Libya, attack of last September. Apparently, it makes a lot of difference, since the CIA's talking points were revised 12 times before Ambassador Susan E. Rice delivered them. Had the attack indeed resulted from a spontaneous, unpredictable demonstration, then the administration's doing nothing in preparation for such violence would be excusable. And such a demonstration run amok may well not have justified mounting a potentially messy military counterforce response. Published May 14, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Justice for Benghazi victims now

    By - The Washington Times

    If you are educated enough to read and smart enough to know that two plus two equals four, you know that the Obama administration was less than forthright about the events in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012. Published May 14, 2013

  • LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Iraq had weapons of mass destruction

    By - The Washington Times

    In 2003, American soldiers stepped into a bunker in Iraq that was filled with drums, each of which was labeled with a chemical warning in Arabic, along with the international chemical-warning symbol. In May 2004, American soldiers in Iraq, as publicly reported by multiple news agencies, including NBC, were attacked using an improvised explosive device that contained the nerve agent sarin. Artillery shells containing a mustard agent were also found in Iraq in 2004. These are easily discoverable facts, not fantasy. Published May 14, 2013

Political Cartoons
  • Man of Steal

    Man of Steal

    Illustration by Dana Summers of the Tribune Media Services

  • Get free daily emails from breaking news to the day's top stories. Privacy Policy
    Happening Now
    Get Involved

    Write for Commentary

    All commentary submissions must be original and exclusive to The Washington Times. Standard length for op-eds is 600-800 words. Longer submissions are less likely to be accepted. Please allow us 72 hours to review your submission. If we have not contacted you within that period, you are free to submit it elsewhere. All op-eds are subject to editing for space, style and clarity.

    Please complete the two forms below and email to commentary@washingtontimes.com

    IRS W-9
    Freelance Agreement