So the United States has threatened to go to the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its concerns over China's rare-earth policies ("Beijing to cut rare-earth exports again," Geopolitics, Dec. 29). We would get much further if we went after the White House, Interior Department, Congress and environmental activist groups.
So the United States has threatened to go to the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its concerns over China's rare-earth policies ("Beijing to cut rare-earth exports again," Geopolitics, Dec. 29). We would get much further if we went after the White House, Interior Department, Congress and environmental activist groups.
So the United States has threatened to go to the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its concerns over China's rare-earth policies ("Beijing to cut rare-earth exports again," Geopolitics, Dec. 29). We would get much further if we went after the White House, Interior Department, Congress and environmental activist groups.
More than 200 years after the first part was written, the Constitution produced standing ovations and strident but respectful debate as lawmakers from both parties read the government's founding document on the House floor in its entirety — or nearly so.
THE SURPRISING RUMSFELD
So the United States has threatened to go to the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its concerns over China's rare-earth policies ("Beijing to cut rare-earth exports again," Geopolitics, Dec. 29). We would get much further if we went after the White House, Interior Department, Congress and environmental activist groups.
So the United States has threatened to go to the World Trade Organization (WTO) with its concerns over China's rare-earth policies ("Beijing to cut rare-earth exports again," Geopolitics, Dec. 29). We would get much further if we went after the White House, Interior Department, Congress and environmental activist groups.
The Constitution was read at the opening of the new session of the House of Representatives yesterday. What was most remarkable about this was the almost hysterical opposition from congressional Democrats and left-wing commentators. In what should have been a united celebration of the nation's foundation document in a period of partisan rancor, liberals instead reinforced the view that they are profoundly uncomfortable with the essential truths underlying American freedom.
