- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
Topic - Greg Vaughan
For financial planners such as Graystone Consulting's Robert Scherer, it's hard to talk about investing these days without fielding dozens of questions from concerned clients about the "fiscal cliff."
"They are less inclined to own stocks in economically sensitive companies," he said.
"To make changes based on an election outcome or the fiscal cliff, to me, is unreasonable," said Mr. Vaughan, the managing director of Morgan Stanley's private wealth management division in Menlo Park, Calif. "I think the uncertainty of people's portfolio returns as a result of the fiscal cliff creates more conversations with current clients.