The Washington Times

Topic - Nathan Siegel

Subscribe to this topic via RSS or ATOM
Related Stories

More Stories →

Quotations
  • "The court avoided the big question that was presented here, which is whether the FCC's indecency policies are unconstitutional. You could say that, in a sense, it's kicking the can down the road," said Nathan Siegel, a First Amendment lawyer and law professor at the University of Maryland. "It doesn't answer the question that people are looking for guidance on."

    FCC's policy on obscenity on TV 'vague' →

  • Mr. Siegel also said that, such legal rationales aside, regulating such a small segment of TV offerings, as Chief Justice Roberts and social conservatives note when they argue that the restrictions are not onerous, is simply irrational.

    Supreme Court mulls profanity, nudity on network TV →

Happening Now