The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Want some torture with your peanuts?

By BLACK & DENNING on July 1, 2008 into Aviation Security

  • Subscribe

 

By P. Jeffrey Black and Jeffrey Denning

Just when you thought you’ve heard it all...

A senior government official with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has expressed great interest in a so-called safety bracelet that would serve as a stun device, similar to that of a police Taser®. According to this promotional video found at the Lamperd Less Lethal, Inc. website, the bracelet would be worn by all airline passengers (video also shown below).

This bracelet would:

• Take the place of an airline boarding pass

• Contain personal information about the traveler

• Be able to monitor the whereabouts of each passenger and his/her luggage

• Shock the wearer on command, completely immobilizing him/her for several minutes
 
The Electronic ID Bracelet, as it’s referred to, would be worn by every traveler “until they disembark the flight at their destination.”  Yes, you read that correctly. Every airline passenger would be tracked by a government-funded GPS, containing personal, private and confidential information, and would shock the customer worse than an electronic dog collar if the passenger got out of line.

Clearly the Electronic ID Bracelet is a euphemism for the EMD Safety Bracelet, or at least it has a nefarious hidden ability (thus the term ID Bracelet is ambiguous at best). EMD stands for Electro-Musclar Disruption. Again, according to the promotional video, the bracelet can completely immobilize the wearer for several minutes.

So is the government really that interested in this bracelet? 

Apparently so.

According to this letter from DHS official, Paul S. Ruwaldt of the Science and Technology Directorate, office of Research and Development, which was written to the inventor whom he had previously met with, Ruwaldt wrote, “To make it clear, we [the federal government] are interested in . . . the immobilizing security bracelet, and look forward to receiving a written proposal.”

The letterhead, in case you were wondering, is from a U.S. Department of Homeland Security office at the William J. Hughes Technical Center at the Atlantic City International Airport, or the Federal Aviation Administration headquarters.

In another part of the letter, Mr. Ruwaldt confirmed, “In addition, it is conceivable to envision a use to improve air security, on passenger planes.”

Would every paying airline passenger flying on a commercial airplane be mandated to wear one of these devices? I cringe at the thought. Not only could it be used as a physical restraining device, but also as a method of interrogation, according to the same aforementioned letter from Mr. Ruwaldt.

Would you let them put one of those on your wrist? Would you allow the airline employees, which would be mandated by the government, to place such a bracelet on any member of your family?

Why are tax dollars being spent on something like this?

Is this a police state or is this America?

 

* * * * *

UPDATE:  Lamperd Less Lethal Inc., the Canadian company that designed the EMD Safety Bracelet, has responded to the controversy as follows:

    We wish to clear up any misconceptions regarding the EMD Safety Bracelet for Airline Security.

    The bracelets remain inactive until a hijacking situation has been identified. At such time a designated crew member will activate the bracelets making them capable of delivering the punitive measure - but only to those that need to be restrained. We believe that all passengers will welcome deliverance from a hijacking, as will the families, carriers, insurance providers etc. The F-16 on the wing-tip is not to reassure the passengers during a hijacking, but rather to shoot them down. Besides activation using the grid screen, the steward / stewardess will have a laser activator that can activate any bracelet as needed by simply pointing the laser at the bracelet - that laser dot only needs to be within 10 inches of the bracelet to activate it.

* * * * *

UPDATE: From CheifBo in the comment section

I would like to inform all interested in the truth about Lamperd's involvement in this project [EMD safety bracelet]. I have personnally been involved in the research and development of state of the art training programs and weapon systems with Lapmerd Less Lethal for the past eight years and have found them to be of the highest of integrity and concern for human life and the preservation of peace. Their mission is to develop and distribute the best products in the world when it comes to Law Enforcement, Security and Military applications within use of force. Having been a sworn law enforcement officer for nearly 27 years and a police trainer in Use of Force Management since 1993 I have observed alot of devices and gimmicks that have come and gone as the catch all in securing America.

Lamperd agreed in principal to assist in the development of this product for the patent holder [inventor]. Once this is established, then more research is placed on the actual application of the device. We conduct our training hands on, we do not farm it out as others do. So before we are ready to place a product on the market we know what it is expected to do and how it is expected to perform. We also go through great lengths to put in place a training program that will school even the novice in safely using any product used in applying force in any situation. I think alot of the readers have jumped the gun when it comes to this issue and this certain product. Lamperd is a publicly traded company that keeps its shareholders informed on its latest products and projects. I admire them for this and so do thousands of police, military and security personnel from all around the world that we have trained. Please feel free to peruse their internet site for continuing updates on products and its mission at www.lamperdlesslethal.com and be safe out there.

* * * * *

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

The following Reader Blogs are neither edited nor endorsed by The Washington Times. These bloggers are responsible for their own content.

There are 76 Comments

TheOldGringo

This stun gun-braclet idea is ghastly, but I don't think the FAA's Mr. Ruwaldt actually said that he saw an application for it as a method of interrogation. I've attempted to translate his letter from the original Geek, and I believe that his phrase "mobile base read/write emitter/interrogator station" simply refers to a piece of hardware that sends radio frequency signals to and from the braclet. The closest English equilalent to "emitter/interrogator" is: "sender/receiver."
Mark as offensive

epimetheus

I completely agree with 'TheOldGringo'. The phrase "emitter/interrogator" is an electronic term for a device that communicates with the braclet. On a more outraged note: How in the world anybody could possibly think this would work is beyond me. Although if your goal is to bankrupt the airline industry, this would do the trick. I would walk before I'd let some TSA puke slap this contraption on me or a member of my family.
Mark as offensive

AriXali

First of all, motivated and resourceful terrorists are not going to be stopped at the last minute from boarding a plane because of this device. If Its easy enough to fit at an airport and be removed at the other end of your journey with minimal delay then how easy is it going to be for a terrorist to disable?? Then there is the idea that the terrorist on board the plane can be stopped by this device if he is wearing it? How? How do you differentiate between the other passengers on the plane & the terrorist or terrorists?? How do you in the confusion of a takeover of the plane use this device? and who wields it? the stewardess? the Pilot? Air Marshal on every flight (that they cannot afford at the moment?) Also say a terrorist takes over the plane, Just 1 person would have an instantaneous method of controlling the whole plane with access to this device!! Crazy, absolutely barking mad idea. Ari Xali
Mark as offensive

liberalismmentaldisorder

The prior posters simply do not value their lives. Your liberalism has polluted your most basic humanistic nature of self preservation. The radical Islamists have made it abundantly clear that they hate you and would like to kill you...yet you have no desire to protect yourself..you see it as an affront to your "freedom" to use any and every technology available to prevent your death..I am not saying this braclet will work…but to brush it off on a philosophical viewpoint rooted in garbage logic... Schmuck what you are ...what freedom will you have when you are wearing a head scarf or dead. Liberalism is a mental disorder - as witnessed by reverend Wright and his long standing and devout parishioner…you to in short order - with the “wright” training - can be spewing hate against your own countrymen. What do you hope to leave the next generation?????
Mark as offensive

boozy

big brother has arrived...if indeed we do not stand up as a country and take it back...we, the citizens own this country, not the idiots who think they are running the show...somehow, someone needs to start a strong movement to beat off this along with the queer thing along with all special interest agendas being ramrodded down americas throat.....NOW...
Mark as offensive

medicis

Oh.... let's all quake in terror at those 'radical Islamists' .... not. I am much more afraid of our government. I was just wondering if anyone can please place one of these stun bracelets around the neck of the Senior government official in the Department of Homeland Stupidity considering this travesty against American rights. We can then call it the stun necklace..... I wonder how he'd feel.....
Mark as offensive

humble_scuba

Here's a question: How do they plan to implement this in regard to international arrivals / departure? I can almost guarantee that other countries will unanimously and passively allow this to pass into effect within their own sovereignties. Furthermore, I know the government has no idea what it's doing with Information Security, but do they really have no idea what a BAD idea this is in terms of potential identity theft? Each of these bracelets contain an RFID chip that contains valuable private information. You don't have to know anything about hacking to purchase a cheap RFID reader and rip information from EVERYONE in the airport. It's too easy to compromise. Also, even though I know the government is aware of my location when I travel by plane, I still don't like the idea of them having a real-time GPS signal of me. I know it's only just before, during, and just after a flight, but it opens the door to further invasions of privacy down the road. And don't start bitching to me about my liberal upbringing slanting my views and not allowing me to see the necessity of giving up a little freedom for a lot of safety. You can screw yourself. Freedom is not a luxury, so don't treat it like one. I believe it was Benjamin Franklin who once said, "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." And finally, I refuse to wear a mini dog-collar. I am not cattle to be zapped at the slightest whim of a twitchy Ranger who's had a bad day. There is too much potential for misuse, and too much potential for this to be a gateway into greater and more prevalent and oppressive forms of control. "Give me Liberty, or give me Death!" Hear, hear!
Mark as offensive

chalmers

We can have the constitutions (state and federal) back as soon as we want them. All we have to do is vote for them. www.horningforgovernor.com
Mark as offensive

antidense

Our founding fathers understood the threat of government over any foreign enemy better than the commoner today. From Patrick Henry's "Give me Liberty or Give me Death!" to Ben Franklin's (attributed) "Those who would give essential liberty for a little safety deserve neither and would lose both", this is hardly a "liberal" point of view, but one that our founders had the balls to stand by and the birth of Democracy itself. What life would we have if the government controls every aspect of your life a la Big Brother? Or has it been too long since people have read Orwell's 1984? Our real enemies are not the terrorists, they are the members of our gov't who have used the threat of terrorism it for their political and monetary gain. Self preservation includes the ability to control one's destiny, otherwise it's worthless. It's too bad that so many people have been spoiled by years of freedom that they may never really be able to appreciate how drastically necessary it is to life.. until it's irreversibly gone.
Mark as offensive

ibvirginian

Okay Jeffreys, that's enough. This is the stupidest article I've read in a long time. Nowhere in the quoted material did the DHS official say anything about EVERYONE wearing the bracelet. If he had said that, I would imagine that that would be important to note. The only place that is mentioned is in the video of the company making them. Of course they'd like millions to be used every day! That's huge for their bottom line! It's insulting that you think so little of your readers that you would imply that the government would implement that. Our rights may not be what they used to be, but this is absurd. Either do a real reporter's job or make it official and write for the tabloids.
Mark as offensive

tunghoy

Here's a better idea: put one of these bracelets on George W. Bush and interrogate HIM about the 9/11 attacks, Iraq, welfare for millionaires, crimes against nature or just about anything else. As for the jack-booted fascist who posted at 6:36 pm, perhaps he could help Bush complete America's transition into a North Korean police state and help Dear Leader shred whatever is left of the Constitution. Republican thugs lie about wanting to protect our freedom and liberty, but are the first ones who try to destroy it.
Mark as offensive

Havor

This is the dumbest idea i ever have seen and can be easily defeated by a simple soda bottle 1. cut a ring out of a bottle 2. put it in your pocket 3. after bracelet is put on your wrist slide it between bracelet and bare skin. I would do it my self just to avoid the change on a system malfunction and getting shocked talking about wasting money hehe A pure RFID bracelet is sent a bad idea i would prefer it over a paper ticket just because its easier, it could also be combined whit info terminals, hold RFID in front of info console and it tels you ware to go for the gate. It can also make a airport a lot more silent if the airport is divided in to small zones the PA would only have to announce in a smaller zone. It could also tell people if they are not waiting at the gate that they have to go there by calculating walking time.
Mark as offensive

shorttime

"Your liberalism has polluted your most basic humanistic nature of self preservation." It's pretty clear that your fear of terrorism has polluted your mind. As for who's got a mental disorder, it is pretty obvious that you are a rage-filled mental case.
Mark as offensive

jjohnsonDC

A true conservative (such as myself) would oppose such extravagance and government encroachment. Unfortunately, true conservatives are an endangered species. All we have in this nation anymore are left-wing liberals who want the government to take care of your welfare, cradle to grave, and right-wing liberals who want the government to watch your every move. Either way we end up throwing money at a problem that is either overblown or else will not be solved by throwing money at it. If our national leaders had any real intelligence, they would look for smarter, more effective methods to combat terrorism without having to waste billions on quixotic programs or shredding what little remains of our Constitution.
Mark as offensive

Silverlight

"The prior posters simply do not value their lives. Your liberalism has polluted your most basic humanistic nature of self preservation." Give me freedom or give me death. You need to find a country that doesn't value freedom and democracy. "Schmuck what you are ...what freedom will you have when you are wearing a head scarf or dead." To you spewing hate of freedom, I echo: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, circa February 17, 1755, from his notes for a proposition at the Pennsylvania Assembly. You're a disgusting cowardly little sack of dirt, and you and those who share your anti-American views no more deserve to call America home than the cowards who use terrorism to attack what she stands for. "Liberalism is a mental disorder - as witnessed by reverend Wright and his long standing and devout parishioner…you to in short order - with the “wright” training - can be spewing hate against your own countrymen." Whilst you spew hate for your countrymen. Hypocrisy is the mental disorder on display here. That, and blatant cowardice.
Mark as offensive
‹‹ previous123456next ››

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.