The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Anniversary of the Bloodiest Battle -- Antietam - Sept. 17, 1862

By Martha M. Boltz on Sept. 17, 2009 into The Civil War

  • Subscribe

The Battle of Antietam, called Sharpsburg by the Confederate Forces, would go down in history as the heaviest in casualties of any war -- not World War I, not World War II, not any of our conflicts or fights in Korea, VietNam or even in today's history with Iraq and Afghanistan --- Antietam stands alone.

As one author says, "McClellan seems to have planned an attack to s trike at both of Lee's flanks, then attack  the center with his reserves.  However, when it came on September 17, the attacke as an uncoordinated series of piecemeal assaults...David Harvey Hill's and James Longstreet's Rebels joined the battle in the East and West Woods, in Farmer Miller's cornfield, and around a church belonging to a German pacifist sect called the Dunkards."  [ these were probably forerunners of the Baptists, who also baptized by immersion.]

I've walked Antietam/Sharpsburg and seen the sunken road known thereafter as "Bloody Lane"  and it's no stretch of the imagination to realize the massacre that occurred there.  Union General Burnside was determined to cross a bridge and stream, and was forced back several times but succeeded in breaking through the Confederate line......only to be faced by a surprise counterattack by A.P. Hill, who had just arrived there with his troops from Harpers Ferry.  The result was the Union troops being forced back -- a terrible cost for the bridge which bears Burnside's name.

The Federals outnumbered the Rebels, and while the battle is considered a tactical draw, the Rebels were driven back to the outskirts of Sharpsburg.

The actual count has never been accurate, but the best efforts say that the Union had 75,316 troops; of these, 2,108 were killed,  9,549 were wounded and 753 were listed as missing.  On the Confederate side, there were 51.844 troops; of these, 2,700 were killed, 9,024 wounded, and approximately 2,000 missing.

Say a prayer today for those who lost their lives that September 17 long ago.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

The following Reader Blogs are neither edited nor endorsed by The Washington Times. These bloggers are responsible for their own content.

There are 1 Comments

johne37179

It is so important to keep some degree of perspective in weighing the price of freedom and the commitment of those who have fought for it and are fighting today. It is also important when looking at the battles of the Civil War to remember that it was us on both sides. The 4800 deaths before noon at Sharpsburg were all American deaths. Put the price paid in this single, one-day battle up against the combat in Iraq and Afghanistan and you realize that while all deaths in combat reach the heart and soul of each of us, we seem to have lost contact with the real price of our freedoms and those to whom we hope to bring that most basic human right. We are so fortunate that not all have lost touch with the value of freedom and still are willing to serve us in our all volunteer force.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.