The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • DC Area
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • I-Team
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Podcasts
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Reader blogs
  • All blogs
  • Create a blog

Is McCain pandering on immigration?

By Stephen Dinan on June 28, 2008 into Dinan

  • Subscribe

John McCain this morning told the National Association of Latino Election and Appointed Officials he supported the 1986 immigration amnesty, but in fact he voted against the bill and was a critic, arguing it was actually too tough on immigrants and Hispanics.

The 1986 bill granted amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants in the country and promised new security measures to crack down on illegal immigration. The amnesty went through, but the security measures were rarely enforced.

Speaking today to NALEO, he brought up that bill: "In 1986, we passed a law that said we would secure the borders and gave amnesty to a couple, three million people. I supported that legislation way back then."

Far from supporting it, McCain didn't only vote against the bill, he used charged language to criticize it. His hometown newspaper, the Arizona Republic, quoted him as saying the bill's requirements for employers to verify workers "would institutionalize discrimination." He said employers would refuse to hire Hispanics to avoid running afoul of the law.

And he happened to be running for the Senate that year, and both he and his opponent opposed the bill, calling it racist during their debates. Here's the Republic's coverage from one of the debates between McCain and Democrat Richard Kimball, from the Oct. 29, 1986, edition:

"Both candidates agreed that the new immigration law is racist because of sanctions against employers who hire illegal aliens.

McCain said that in order to avoid possible legal problems, employers would not hire a Hispanic if there were any questions about citizenship. Kimball said Mexico's economic problems must be solved before illegal immigration can be dealt with effectively."

In the years after it, McCain was quite clear about his opposition, including sponsoring bills to undo those employer sanctions.

"Employer sanctions represents a failed, albeit well intended, experiment in illegal immigration control. But the facts are clear, the experiment has failed," he said on the Senate floor Sept. 20, 1991, as he cosponsored one of those bills.

McCain has been criticized for being all over the map on immigration and pandering to different groups. His recent closed meeting with Hispanics in Chicago only upped that criticism.

The McCain camp says he was talking broadly today about "his support for a comprehensive solution," and says his opposition to the 1986 bill is "a point of record.

But McCain specifically mentioned "legislation" and the issue in 1986 was not comprehensive, it was amnesty. This is a signature issue for him, and one on which he should know his own record.

— Stephen Dinan, national political correspondent, The Washington Times

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 3 Comments

Quidam

McCain is just another flip-flopper and should be running as a Democrat.
Mark as offensive

Straight Talk Hawk

MCAMNESTY'S MEXAMERICANADA--NO WAY, JUAN! In the amnesty bill McAmnesty tried to ram through the Senate last summer without letting anyone read it (remember the purple-faced, foul-mouthed rages?), there was an approval of the SPP and its "unimilitary" for the continent of North America (Mexican generals in charge?). Slick Talk needs to come clean on his proposed new North American Union, with its shiny Amero to replace the dollar he has devalued as part of the scheme; the "superhighway" that would cut the nation in two; elimination of our borders, letting anyone roam anywhere; continued destruction of American infrastructure, jobs, and industries; Communist Chinese ports in Mexico flooding us with even more uninspected junk products and diseases causing billions of dollars of damage (e.g., the Emerald Ash borer now deforesting the upper Midwest); and the continued flow of drug dealers, terrorists, and MS 13-type gangs he has allowed to invade our country, in violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which REQUIRES the federal government to protect the states from invasion. This loser is nothing but a neo-con globalist sellout bent on the destruction of our country. Republicans, please dump McAmnesty and nominate a real American who will preserve, protect, and defend our Constitution and our country.
Mark as offensive

tomc100

Juan McCain co-wrote and endorsed with Kennedy that horrible Amnesty bill which was the single worst legislation ever written in the entire US history. Anyone who endorsed that bill should be charged with treason, fined, and imprisoned. Republicans are insane to choose this liberal loser as their presidential candidate. Most true conservatives will stay home or leave their votes blank. And Obama bin Laden is just as bad if not worse which is saying a lot. The Republican party needs to kick this senile old fool out of their party. He's not even conservative. Whoever is nominated be prepared to learn Spanish.
Mark as offensive
Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.