

In the issue of The New Yorker on news stands, Hendrik Hertzberg's opening essay sums up why getting the Nobel Prize was not a good thing for President Obama:
He came into office on a tide of euphoria. Lately, though, his supporters have been experiencing a vague sense of disappointment. He may have saved the world from a second Great Depression and all that, but the jobless rate keeps on climbing, the planet keeps on heating up, Guantánamo keeps on not getting closed, and roadside bombs keep on exploding. He’s had eight whole months, and he still hasn’t signed a comprehensive health-care bill. Given that his perceived political problem is exaggerated expectations, does he really need a Nobel Peace Prize before he has actually made any peace?
Read the whole thing.
-- Jon Ward, White House reporter, The Washington Times
Follow me on Twitter // jward@washingtontimes.com // Read my latest articles here // My YouTube channel

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

By Dave Boyer and Susan Crabtree - The Washington Times

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times

By Patrice Hill - The Washington Times
Nicholas Rastenis has been through the wringer.

By Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich hinted Sunday that if rival Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney ...

By Manuel Valdes - Associated Press
updated 56 minutes ago
Three skiers were killed Sunday when an avalanche swept them about a quarter-mile down an ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Charm City Charmers: a not-so-ragtag group of Baltimore area writers lead by Tamar Alexia Fleishman

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.