The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Beyond 'Woody'

By Daniel Wattenberg on Nov. 6, 2009 into SNOBlog

  • Subscribe

In our brave new world of psychopharmacology, it was bound to happen. The familiar film persona of Woody Allen now faces a credibility problem.

These days, the "Woody Allen character" — misanthropic, pessimistic, alienated, morose — would likely be diagnosed as clinically depressed and successfully treated with anti-depressants.

Of course, Woody Allen, filmmaker, can't afford to let the "Woody Allen character" achieve too much mental health: The character's weltschmerz, existential despair and alienation are central to many of the auteur's best comedies — the source of their fatalistic humor, high-contrast romantic mismatches and much else.

The filmmaker has taken a stab at resolving his dilemma in his latest film, "Whatever Works," released on video last week (Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, Blu-ray $26.99, DVD $17.99). Here, the Woody surrogate is Boris Yellnikoff  (Larry David, in the Woody-surrogate tradition of Kenneth Branagh and Jason Biggs, among others). Cantankerous, anhedonic and suicidally depressed, Boris is a "genius" ex-physicist-turned-bohemian recluse who sees through the comforting tissue of illusion that envelops the rest of us.

How do you explain such chronic misery in an age of readily prescribed Zoloft and Prozac? Easy: Boris, as he reveals to his wife in a backstory break-up scene, has gone "off his meds."

Nice try. But in having Boris go "off his meds," the filmmaker has simply exchanged one credibility problem for another. The film revolves around Boris’ personal credo — "Whatever works." Faced with the hopeless, pointless predicament that is human existence, Boris advises, seize happiness — however fleeting or illusory — wherever you find it: Ménages a trois, recreational drugs, music or socially taboo May-December romances like Boris' with teenaged runaway Melodie (Evan Rachel Wood) — whatever works.

Whatever works … except anti-depressants? Whatever works, in other words, except what "works" best and, in Boris' worlds (Manhattan’s academic and bohemian milieux, successively) carries no social stigma? What objections could Boris — an atheist, a scientist — possibly have to taking his meds?

No, there's a more intractable conflict here between art and science — yeah, another one of those — than Woody Allen can resolve by having Boris Yellnikoff "go off his meds."

It's a cultural milestone of sorts: The "Woody Allen character" has quietly become an anachronism, dramatically implausible in his own contemporary cultural habitat.

It's hard not to wonder what range of human character types we are on the verge of pathologizing out of the dramatic repertoire of the future. Perhaps it's a good thing we'll be too happy to care.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 4 Comments

Pantagruel123

Larry David's character is Boris Yellnikoff, not Walter. Did you even see the movie. Get your facts straight first and them start your stupid moralizing, fool!
Mark as offensive

protractor

Does one have to be an religious or superstitious to object to taking anti-depressants?
Mark as offensive

alex_pieske

As one who has "gone off his meds" from time to time to "seize happiness" in one form or another, I find the writer's confidence in psychopharmacology to be amusingly naive. I wouldn't argue against the many successes of anti-depressants, but to say that we are in danger of losing misery as a reliable human experience paints a picture so distant from reality one wonders exactly what drugs the writer is on.
Mark as offensive

HandsomeDude

Anti-depressants have made depression a thing of the past? Life on anti-depressants offers no downside? A man drawn to a May-December romance wouldn't consider life without the sexual side effects caused by some anti-depressants? People (whether depressed, fictional or neither) always do what society feels is best for them? Even my friends whose lives have been saved by anti-depressants would agree the answers are no, no, no and no.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.