The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

Save your money

By LES JACKSON on Sept. 15, 2008 into Spinning Wheels: A Community for Car Lovers

  • Subscribe

Remember Phineas T. Barnum? The famous showman and huckster is incorrectly credited with saying, "there's a sucker born every minute," but the statement itself is quite true. Those annoying "as seen on TV" commercials make a strong case for that statement, because blatherscapes Billy Mays, Ronald Popeil and Anthony Sullivan - and now that Vince character selling the Shamwow - are making millions selling cheap, gimmicky, unnecessary junk products over the airwaves.

I have a simple rule about buying things. If it's sold on TV or over the phone by a solicitor, I don't buy it. I strongly urge you readers to adopt the same rule, but if you feel compelled to buy the stuff then go ahead - but please don't buy oil/cooling/fuel additives!

Oil, cooling system and fuel additives have been marketed for nearly a century. In the old days some of these products actually performed minimal service because automotive machinery was fairly primitive. By the 1960s engines, cooling and fuel systems became efficient enough that few, if any, additives were effective. Today, the only effective additives sold on the market are those that absorb water (condensation) in fuel tanks. All the rest are worthless, including the now-popular "engine flush" procedure offered by hundreds of repair shops. All of these are "marketing breakthroughs," not technical breakthroughs.

All oil additives advertise reduced friction, cooler running, greater fuel economy and, occasionally, quieter operation. The compounds in these additives generally fall into three categories: chlorinated parafins; synthetic oils and PTFE (Teflon) suspensions. All, in the exact conditions in which they function, can reduce friction, etc., but here's the thing: these conditions don't occur in normal engines! They only occur seconds before failure, so an additive might in the best case, keep the engine running a few seconds longer.

I have talked with hundreds of automotive engineers - the people who design the engines and transmissions and fuel and cooling systems - over the past 20 years or so and I can assure you that none of them would recommend any aftermarket additive. Most would tell you that oil additives have the potential to upset the delicate chemical properties of lubricants and could harm your engines and transmissions rather than help them.

The same goes for cooling and fuel system additives, especially those that "clean fuel injectors." Steer clear of magnetic fuel enhancers, turbo air directors and most anything that uses the word "tech" in their brand names. At the risk of being repetitive, if it's hawked on TV infomercials, don't buy it.

So why, you might ask, do a number of legitimate, well-known spokespersons and race drivers and fleet managers endorse these products? The simple answer to that question is that they are being handsomely paid for their endorsements. They aren't too concerned about their credibility because they know how short the attention span of the average consumer tends to be and don't care much about negative press.

I would be embarrassed to say how modest my income is, and I've been offered substantial (read: a heck of a lot!) amounts of money to endorse some of these products in print and on my radio show. Like everyone else I need the money, but I have this conscience-thing about taking advantage of people's trust and seeing them throw away their hard-earned cash for nothing. I don't consider myself noble or saintly or more ethical than the average guy. I just want to go to sleep at night knowing I haven't duped someone out of his/her money.

By the way, you'll probably meet a number of people who swear by some of the additives and will tell you how much better their cars run (smoother, better mileage, etc.) They are actually seeing an effect, but it's not due to the additives. It's due to the Hawthorne Effect. Look it up.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

The following Reader Blogs are neither edited nor endorsed by The Washington Times. These bloggers are responsible for their own content.

There are 0 Comments

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.