The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out


  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • TWT BLOGS: Latest
  • Staff blogs
  • Create a blog

If it's Lieberman...

By Stephen Dinan on Aug. 28, 2008 into Trail Times

  • Subscribe

The Committee for Justice, which pushes for confirmation of conservative federal judges, says Joe Lieberman, the former Democrat-turned-independent, could be a problem as John McCain's vice presidential running mate. They offer three steps he could take to assuage conservatives' fears he would push for pro-choice, liberal judges: Recuse himself from helping McCain pick judges, promise not to run for president himself, and agree to caucus for the rest of the year with Republicans.

That last one is the most intriguing: With control of the Senate split 49-49, the two independents who caucus with the Democrats mean Democrats control the chamber, and can refuse to bring judges to the floor for a vote. If Lieberman were to switch, that would make the Senate effectively 50-50, meaning Vice President Dick Cheney's tie-breaking vote would swing control to Republicans, as it did in 2001.

As Curt Levey at the Committee for Justice says: "That would make Arlen Specter chairman of the Judiciary Committee and Mitch McConnell Majority Leader, likely resulting in the confirmation of four pending appeals court nominees to the all-important Fourth and D.C. Circuits. Senate Democrats would be unwilling to risk the fate of Tom Daschle by filibustering nominees so close to an election."

Levey says he doubts Lieberman would make any such deals, and he's probably right. But for the large percentage of conservatives who say judges is the only reason to vote for McCain this year, Lieberman would be a scary pick. McCain might consider asking for some sort of assurances from Lieberman to convince those conservatives.

— Stephen Dinan, national political correspondent, The Washington Times

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Comment

There are 3 Comments

pastor123

I think McCain will start to slump in the polls big time., Many conservatives feel he has burned the bridge he was trying to build with us. He has no commitment to the base. I am a Conservative who has voted republican my entire life. Now I am Voting for Obama. The only way I would vote McCain is if Huckabee was on the ticket. Romney is not a conservative. Lieberman is not a conservative. Pawlenty is just too unknown for me to take a chance. I just sent off for My Obama Biden Bumper Sticker, They will send you one for free at http://www.McCanes.com McCain is going to lose, becuase he refuses to make any gestures of good faith to the Christian BAse of the GOP. GO OBAMA!!!
Mark as offensive

Ellis3rd

Brilliant idea. Too often conservatives are consumed with appearance over results. In retrospect, most conservatives were wrong about McCain's Gang of 14 since, ultimately, it led to the confirmation of Alito and prevented the Dems from using the nuclear option on him. Alito will most likely sit on the bench for 30 years, arguably more important to advancing the conservative cause than winning a one presidential election.
Mark as offensive

tomc100

Pastor123, you are the biggest fool alive if you actually think anyone out there is going to believe that you are a true conservative. No conservative in their right minds will vote for Obama who is a flaming liberal. In fact he is voted the MOST liberal senator even worse than Ted Kennedy and Biden is the third most liberal. If Mccain is stupid enough to choose Lieberman then most if not ALL conservatives will stay home or vote independent. You my friend are one of those dipsticks who pretend to be a conservative and send out disinformation to encourage Mccain to not choose Romney who will undoubtedly win the election by a LANDSLIDE. Huckabee? What a joke. The likelihood of that actually happen is when gas drops down to a dollar a gallon. Having to choose Mccain is bad enough but in order for conservatives to vote for him he needs to put some sugar on that turd and it certainly isn't Huckabee. At least Romney knows about economics and is much more conservative than Juan Amnesty Mccain.
Mark as offensive

Please login or register to post a comment

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.