


Both presidential candidates support mandates to force Americans to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, so it's one of the ironies of this campaign that neither Barack Obama nor John McCain specifically pays for carbon offsets.
Now someone has done the calculations for them and found out Obama has the bigger carbon footprint, at 77,894 tons of carbon emitted over the course of the campaign, compared to 58,786 for McCain.
By comparison the EPA says the average two-person household emits 5.5 tons a year.
I have reported in the past that other candidates — Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards, in particular — paid companies to offset their emissions. More than a year ago the McCain campaign promised a study to look at offsets, but has not taken steps. The Obama campaign has a list of steps it's taken to reduce emissions, but does not pay for offsets. The air charter company it uses does pay for offsets for flights.
— Stephen Dinan, national political correspondent, The Washington Times

By David Eldridge and Cheryl Wetzstein - The Washington Times

By Ben Wolfgang - The Washington Times

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times

By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times
Within weeks of an inspector general’s report that criticized a bid by the D.C. Lottery ...

By David Hood - The Washington Times
Their ranks have thinned over the past three years, but a renewed sense of optimism ...

By Nekesa Mumbi Moody - Associated Press
Adele, who captured the world’s heart with an album about a broken romance, emerged as ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A mother of three and a passionate conservative, Shirley Husar changes the game with commentary on the political game ala California, U.S.A.

A slice of suburban family life from the diverse perspectives of a politically minded mom.

A wife, mother of three and world waterskiing champion looks at the world through the eyes of her faith.

From family to children, to life on our street and in our world, Lori shares her view of the world