- The Washington Times - Monday, December 6, 1999

Amish family values

“With fierce obstinance, theyhave defended family integrity’and the functional nature of thefamily… . And in consequence,their families are larger andstronger. Divorce is rare… .

“Theirs is a family-centricworld, full of life, children’slaughter, and essential security.The typical Amish family hasseven children; the typical elderlycouple will have 45 grandchil-dren; the typical child will have75 first cousins.

“Contrast this with the near fu-ture of many so-called developed’lands where, in the wake of …the one child’ family, over half ofthe population will have no broth-ers and sisters, no aunts and un-cles, and no cousins.”



Allen Carlson, from “Re-building a Family-Centric Cul-ture,” a Nov. 15 address to theWorld Congress of Families in Ge-neva

Evolution or else

“What is it about the topic ofevolution that drives so manypeople nuts? … Since activist op-ponents of evolution are as a rulepolitically conservative, any moveagainst Darwinism is treated bysome overwrought folks as thefirst step on the path to fascism,with a flat tax and a ban on abor-tion soon to follow.

“So the camel’s nose must beshoved back with the same vigorand tactics as was the SupremeCourt nomination of RobertBork.”

Michael J. Behe, writing on”Darwin’s Hostages,” in theDecember/January issue of theAmerican Spectator

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Senseless in Seattle

“In the ‘60s, draft-card-burningstudents held teach-ins on Viet-nam, sang Give Peace a Chance’and stormed the Pentagon. Toeducate the American publicabout the evils of free trade in the’90s, a San Francisco arm of theanti-WTO coalition called theGlobal Exchange rappelled downthe front of the Old Navy store inSeattle with a banner, chanting,Sweatshops: Free Trade or Cor-porate Slavery?’

“Others bashed in windows atMcDonald’s, Nordstrom’s andNiketown. Incongruously, many ofthem looked as if they had justshopped in the stores they weretrashing… .

“[Seattle] schoolchildren …bring home reports of efforts toget them to cut classes and takepart in the demonstrations. Whenmy 14-year-old and his pal de-clared this intention, it turned outthat their knowledge of the WTOwas rather limited. Is it abouthow bad trade is?’ my son tried.

“Well, that’s what they say, Ianswered, but before you boysjoin the protests, why don’t youtake off your shoes and see wherethey were made.

“Oops. One pair said Thailand,’another China.’ Guess you’ll haveto go barefoot, I suggested. Nevermind, they replied. Back toschool. Maybe the shoes testmight be a good one for all thedemonstrators. You are dis-qualified from demonstrating ifyou are objectively part of the ex-ploiter class.”

Bruce Chapman, writing on”Radical Chic in the Brand NewLeft’s World of Fashion,” in theDec. 1 edition of the Seattle PostIntelligencer

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide