- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 17, 2000

NEW YORK Network Solutions Inc., the Herndon, Va. company that long held a monopoly on registering Internet addresses, is under attack for keeping thousands of valuable names.

Some critics are accusing the company of trying to profit from the simpler names that sometimes can command thousands, even millions, of dollars in the resale market at a time when unique Internet addresses are becoming scarcer.

Others say the unexplained delays in recycling older names leave an impression of favoritism for insiders.

"It's very frustrating," said Rick Rotondi, a Charlotte, N.C., book publisher eyeing dozens of names that have long expired. "There needs to be a policy for when the names come on the market."

Mr. Rotondi is considering a monogram business in which individuals could get e-mail addresses based on their initials such as hjm.com for Hank J. Miller. Records show combinations such as hjm.com expired last year, but are still unavailable.

Hjm.com was registered to New York-based HJM Consulting, but the rights expired in November. The phone company had no current listing for HJM Consulting.

The latest controversy over Internet addresses means new headaches for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), an international organization with ill-defined powers to oversee global naming policies.

Although ICANN plans to expand the pool of addresses next year, names ending in ".com" are likely to remain the most popular and thus command the most dollars. Four-fifths of the more than 19 million domain names registered are dot-coms.

A company, group or individual can register a new name for a basic registration fee $35 a year in the case of Network Solutions. Those who no longer need the name can let it expire or try to resell it through auction brokers such as GreatDomains.com.

Names registered earlier tend to be shorter and easier to remember, making their Web sites easier to find. Thus, used names are often more valuable than new ones: Consider a Houston entrepreneur's resale of business.com for a record $7.5 million.

"Everything has been bought up," said Jeff Tinsley, chief executive of GreatDomains. "People are forced now to get extremely creative, adding hyphens or three or four words at the end."

Earlier this summer, Network Solutions announced plans to enter the lucrative resale market but with a twist. Instead of letting only owners auction their own names, the company said it also would resell names with delinquent accounts.

Network Solutions said it is entitled to do so to recover unpaid registration fees. Competitors believe the company should return the names to the general pool to give all registrants access to the better ones.

Because Network Solutions remains the sole keeper of the master lists of names, it is generally the first to know when a name becomes available. Grabbing such names to resell on its own, critics say, amounts to an abuse of its former monopolistic power.

"NSI was a monopolist and is hoarding names without any real oversight," said Elana Broitman, policy director at competitor Register.com. "That's going to be a concern."

It's not clear just how many names are involved.

Competitors estimate that Network Solutions is keeping 1 million to 3 million expired names. Company spokeswoman Cheryl Regan said the company does not disclose such figures.

Miss Regan said the new policy applies only to names registered after competition began last year in the registration realm. She said prices would be no higher than the uncollected fees.

"We were using this strategy to recoup our losses," she said. "The best analogy is to look at it as repossessing an asset."

But a Network Solutions competitor, BuyDomains.com, found the company also retaining older names such as CentralControl.com and Fineline.com, the rights to which are listed as having expired. Although Miss Regan said the company had no plans to resell those names, she could not explain why they are still unavailable.

One critic points to the dispute as yet another reason to abolish ICANN and build a new oversight agency from scratch, one with well-defined roles and policies to prevent any abuse.

"The Internet is rapidly becoming the underpinning of most of our technological structure," said Lauren Weinstein, co-founder of People for Internet Responsibility in California. "You can't do this ad hoc and have problem after problem hitting you."

ICANN's chief policy officer, Andrew McLaughlin, said the agency will discuss new policies at its annual meeting in November. In the meantime, Network Solutions has agreed to delay its resale plans.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide