- The Washington Times - Wednesday, August 9, 2000

The uncoiling, unraveling and decoding of the DNA structure by the Humane Genome Project and the Celera Genomics Group is a magnificent scientific achievement and monumental medical milestone. But what does it really mean to the rest of us mortals?

To begin with, it means much less than most people think, hope or worry. As diagnostic physicians, we've been trying to come up with a good analogy. Perhaps figuring out the sequence of the chemical elements in human DNA is like finding a huge pile of ancient document scraps in an unknown language and using computers to help sort out the correct order and position of the symbols. But even when sorted out, how could we figure out what the symbols mean? In DNA, scientists have figured out the ordering of the language symbols but don't know what most of the message means.

Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics were in this quagmire until the Rosetta Stone was discovered in 1799. Although a large number of inscriptions were known, their meaning was unknown. The Rosetta Stone had the same message inscribed in three different languages including Greek, a known language, and also in the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic writing. The Rosetta Stone gave Egyptologists a jump start in deciphering the hieroglyphic script. Even then, it took several decades before the meaning of the Rosetta hieroglyphs was decoded. Further decades passed before many other ancient documents could be understood.

In a parallel way, DNA scientists now have 739 megabytes of decoded human DNA data but have only started to figure out what it means in terms of normal and abnormal anatomy, biochemistry and physiology. Many discoveries have been made, but a much larger number will be made in the future.

Although we don't know the ultimate impact these DNA discoveries will make in daily medical practice, we believe we get many hints from the medical impact of scientific discoveries in the past:

• When first discovered several centuries ago, blood pressure was only a curiosity but has become vitally important in diagnosing and managing strokes, heart attacks and other life threatening conditions.

• Blood chemistry measurements weren't very valuable until the differences in the values in many different diseases and conditions were analyzed over many decades.

• In the mid-20th century, heart surgery not only faced overwhelming technical problems but serious ethical questions. Today, these procedures provide new life for children and adults.

• Although initially not appreciated as such, blood transfusions were the first organ transplants. Subsequent transplants of other organs, such as kidneys, liver or lungs, were initially more controversial. Unlike blood, which is regenerated completely by the donor, kidneys and lungs don't grow back. Heart transplants continue to raise ethical questions, as the beating heart has differentiated life from death throughout human history.

• By contrast, the discovery and invention of penicillin and other antibiotics over the last 80 years provided immediate life-saving clinical benefits. While a major scientific leap, such drugs raised few scientific or ethical controversies, and thus, were rapidly adopted.

We suspect that the future applications of the DNA discoveries will not suddenly appear but will be gradually folded into the practice of medicine over time. Ethical questions will doubtless arise, but the possibility of human cloning or "people farming" remains remote on biological grounds alone.

Even if a human being were to be cloned, the result would simply be another human being carrying the same genes as the gene donor, but a very different person because of different environment and experience. The clones would be similar to identical human twins who are very similar physically but still have their own unique identity and life experience. We estimate that more than 99 percent of future applications DNA research will not be ethically worrisome.

The DNA shuffle will provide ammunition for countless books, movies, TV mysteries and talking heads. How about a new board game for those who really want to take the ultimate memory challenge? In the meantime, the relentless march of medical miracles from this latest discovery will thankfully move on slowly and deliberately. For us, as senior physicians, we hope not too slowly.

Dr. Robert J. Cihak, of Aberdeen, Wash., is president-elect of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Dr. Michael Arnold Glueck, of Newport Beach, Calif., has written extensively on medical, medical-legal and disability-reform issues.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide