- The Washington Times - Friday, December 15, 2000

Somewhere someone has a warehouse full of old bus-stop benches and tattered billboards, and crates of lapel buttons hidden in a barn. The stuff of opportunity.

These are the benches, buttons and backwoods billboards emblazoned with the right-wing mantra of the '50s: "Impeach Earl Warren."

A rabble of preachers, a couple of sorehead senators, a clutch of law-school professors yearning for three or four minutes of cheap fame, a few stars of the chattering class and other self-righteous worthies of the blowhard left need only a few limp brushes and cans of paint, enough to cover up the name of Earl Warren, the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court that held school segregation to be unconstitutional a half-century ago. Then they can paint in the names of the new targets.

Earl Warren became the devil in the night dreams of a generation of critics who imagined that desegregation would destroy the public schools. Now we've got new robed villains.

The fantastical rhetoric of the "Impeach Scalia/ Rehnquist" regiments sounds remarkably like the rhetoric of the Deep South of the '50s, as if someone had found a trunk of musty old newspaper clippings hidden away with crazy aunts in the attic. In fact, maybe someone did. "This decision," says Sen. Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, a Democrat, "will leave in place a vote tally that by the court's own logic is constitutionally flawed." Compare Mr. Leahy's remarks to those of state Sen. Buford Elrod Turnipseed of South Carolina, circa 1956: "This ghastly decision thrusts upon us a tally that is constitutionally flawed, even by the court's own logic."

The Rev. Jesse Jackson rejects George W. as Bill Clinton's successor, whatever that means, "with every bone in my body and every ounce of moral strength in my soul." If Jesse is the source of the moral strength of "civil rights explosion" he promises to unleash in the streets we must pray for the demonstrators in the streets. But compare Jesse's remarks to this oration by Buddy Bob Beanfield, the Grand Beagle of the Mystic Knights of the Klan of the Sea, on April 3, 1957 in Dry Prong (Grant Parish), La.: "Every ounce of my bones cries out for the morality of my soul. We must reject the Warren Court's crimes against humanity."

You can see the passion and the possibilities. "Rehnquist" and "Scalia" are harder to spell than "Earl Warren," but this is a unique opportunity for the Birchers to unload their benches, buttons and billboards. The hysterical old women dithering about in Congress, pulpit and op-ed page in the wake of the court's 7-2 vote trashing Florida's imaginative vote-counting could get these benches and billboards up to date quicker than a little old lady in Palm Beach could put a dimple in a punch-card ballot.

What these voices on the left can't come to grips with is that cooler, saner, wiser heads prevailed, and the left-liberal manipulation of the courts for political ends that worked for 50 years didn't work this time. The mischief was concocted in Tallahassee, when the all-Democratic Florida Supreme Court winked at the Gore lawyers' scheme to fish around in the ballots of three overwhelmingly Democratic counties, with Democratic canvassing boards, until they manufactured enough votes to overtake George W. Bush. This is what seven justices of the U.S. Supreme Court would not allow. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, willing to allow ignoble tactics in a noble cause, dissented: " … we live in an imperfect world," she wrote, echoing John F. Kennedy's famous observation that life is unfair, "one in which thousands of votes have not been counted. I cannot agree that the recount adopted by the Florida court, flawed as it may be, would yield a result any less fair or precise than the certification that preceded that recount."

The only solution, naturally, is to be fairer to some than to others, and so why not be fairer to her friends.

As entertaining as this is (nothing pleases like watching your onetime tormentors twist slowly, slowly in the wind of their own making) the hysteria of the chattering class poses considerable risk to George W. Bush unless he and his Texans are aware of their considerable peril.

Their mantra "Unfair! Unfair!" will soon subside, and in its place they will murmur that they can make everything possible, if not easy, for him if he'll just be a good Republican and work for the things he campaigned against and that his 49,820,518 constituents voted against.

In due time, after he has disappointed those who worked for him because they believed in who he said he was, he will be left sliced, diced and bleeding, just the way his new "friends" left his father, abandoned and bleeding in the ruins of a presidency.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide