- The Washington Times - Saturday, December 30, 2000

In this year’s inevitable election postmortem, I think Republicans should seriously consider why they haven’t been able to break the race barrier. Given their new president, they couldn’t be better positioned to tackle this problem.

First, let me clarify something. It bothers me and, I am sure, most Republicans and conservatives to think in these terms. We prefer to approach politics from a purely colorblind perspective. We don’t want to fashion policies geared to one particular race or gender group.

What I’m referring to is a bit different. I think it is time Republicans countered the negative stereotypes fostered by the Democratic Party concerning the Republicans’ attitude toward blacks. Sure, Republicans will gain politically if they discredit these stereotypes, and I am all for that, but society as a whole will benefit as well.

Presidential exit polls show that 90 percent of black voters chose Al Gore, and only 9 percent voted for George W. Bush. Those numbers are staggering and alarming, but they aren’t that different from previous elections. What motivated me to write this column, however, was two back-to-back e-mails I received last weekend.

One e-mailer wrote: “It’s not diatribe that Republicans have contempt for the poor and blacks. Just listen in sometime to your brother preaching to his flock, for instance. I suppose you-all think now that Bush has or will appoint a couple of token African-Americans to his Cabinet, black folks should just get down and kiss his feet and forget all past indignities, discrimination and unfairness. I almost feel sorry for my conservative acquaintances who despise blacks. The first two appointments to the new Cabinet [are] African-Americans. This must be a bitter pill for them to swallow.”

Another one was similar, but contained too much profanity to be reproduced in this column. But you get the point. Just to be sure, let me explain:

In my humblest of opinions, these are not just isolated, radical liberal or Democratic e-mailers. I have been discussing politics long enough to know that many Democrats either believe or want to create the impression for partisan purposes that Republicans truly are racists. Indeed, if the truth be known, many harbor the belief that ideological conservatism itself is just one big hate crime.

How else do you explain the incredibly monolithic black vote? How else do you explain Jesse Jackson’s continued prominence notwithstanding his irresponsible and destructive rhetoric? Why doesn’t this preacher of the Gospel lose all credibility when he says that “voting while black” is the newest crime and that there will be blood in the streets? Why is Mr. Jackson not shamed off the stage for claiming that Republicans tried to disenfranchise blacks in Florida just because certain counties with large black populations have less modern voting equipment? Keep in mind that these counties are under Democratic control.

I have to assume that Mr. Jackson would quit spewing this vitriol if it didn’t work. But how can it possibly work? How can such falsehoods have any traction in the black community?

I am really not sure, but I think it is time we tried to find out. I think it is time Republicans began to counter the propaganda. I think it is time Republicans challenge Democrats to tone down the racially divisive rhetoric. That and its cousin class warfare demagoguery are greatly polarizing and damaging our society in ways that transcend mere party politics.

Perhaps the Democratic leadership is afraid to debate the merits of the issues without using the club of racial politics. Maybe they are afraid that if they quit dividing people along racial, gender and socioeconomic lines they will relegate themselves to political obscurity. After all, they can barely win elections with 90 percent of the black vote. What if they garnered only half the black vote?

It is ironic that a Republican president-elect has already named three minorities (one also a woman) to his inner circle and he has just begun. Yet I don’t think their race had anything to do with Mr. Bush picking them. He doesn’t think in those terms. As a society we would all be better off if no one else did either.

George W. Bush is just the type of leader to demonstrate that Republicans care about the plight of all people, irrespective of race, gender or socioeconomic status. The public’s acceptance of that message will be good for Republicans, but more importantly for the health of our nation.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide