- The Washington Times - Saturday, January 1, 2000

Just when we need him, here comes Janus, the Roman god for whom the new month is named, the god with two heads. He needs them both this year, when, on the eve of a new presidential administration, he can look back with a critical eye on the past and forward with a hopeful eye on the future.
Some of the contrasts he'll see are particularly striking and may be instructive for the rest of us.
Vice president. Both presidential candidates made strong choices for running mates. George W. Bush showed himself to be a man of humility in choosing Dick Cheney, who was much more experienced in the ways of Washington. During the bitter postelection period it was Mr. Cheney who was reassuring while Mr. Bush appropriately stayed out of the spotlight (where he did not say things to regret later). Mr. Cheney gives the public confidence that getting off to a late start is not as damaging as it might have been.
Vice President Al Gore's choice of Sen. Joe Lieberman erased in an instant the idea that Mr. Gore was fused at the hip to President Bill Clinton. By choosing the Democratic senator who had scolded the president for immoral behavior, Mr. Gore reduced Mr. Clinton as a liability. But Mr. Lieberman was disappointing as a candidate because he had, or thought he had, to repudiate himself. We can hope his return to the Senate will be accompanied by the return of the Mr. Lieberman we all admired.
First and second ladies. Laura Bush showed poise and understated eloquence as a one-time librarian and teacher speaking out for literacy. She complements her husband's concerns that "no child should be left behind" and that "it's time to end the soft bigotry of low expectations." No smug appeals to a "co-presidency" or getting two for the price of one. Refreshing.
Lynne Cheney comes back to Washington where she was the chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities (1986-1988). She was a fierce critic of "political correctness" because it dumbs down education in schools and colleges. Let's hope that she will continue to be a forceful critic. Tipper Gore, her predecessor as second lady, once bravely criticized the Hollywood establishment for the poison it pumps into the culture, but she was silenced when her husband needed campaign money from those who pump up the poison. Pity.
Attorney general. The president-elect wants John Ashcroft. The liberals are out with their long knives. Gone are the accolades for his graceful concession speech, refusing to push a strong but divisive election contest when he lost his Missouri Senate seat to a dead man. (Imagine what Mr. Gore's lawyers would have done with that one.) Some blacks oppose Mr. Ashcroft because he opposes affirmative action (on principle) and many feminists oppose him because he's pro-life (on principle). If he wins confirmation he will follow an unprincipled and politicized attorney general.
Janet Reno ordered the raid on Waco to save the children. As a result the children were incinerated. (They'll never be abused again.) She ordered Elian Gonzales abducted at the point of an automatic rifle from the secure arms of a young man who plucked him from the sea because she didn't trust the law to do what she wanted it to do. Her repeated refusal to appoint an independent counsel to investigate Mr. Gore's suspicious fund-raising drew criticism from Louis Freeh, director of the FBI. The new attorney general must be motivated by principle rather than politics if respect for the law is to be restored.
President of the United States. A former governor of Texas replaces a former governor of Arkansas. But being a governor is probably the only thing the two men have in common. Mr. Clinton is a brilliant man who used cynically his charm and savvy to accomplish nefarious ends. He knew when it was important to compromise (welfare legislation) and to camouflage his exploitation of others (whether his wife, a mistress, or merely a passing object of casual lust). He inherited a roaring economy and, to his credit, didn't interfere. This roaring economy kept most of the public on his side, although he never won a majority of the popular vote.
Mr. Bush arrives when the economy seems to be coughing, not roaring. The president-elect carries none of the personal baggage of Mr. Clinton, but neither does he arrive with the Clinton reputation for smarts. Many of those relieved to see Mr. Clinton leave the White House are not yet confident of the man who will replace him. They have cautious but legitimate hopes.
Janus is meant to oversee exits and entrances. He's an observer, not a prophet. But looking ahead is sure sweeter than looking back. Just ask anyone.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide