- The Washington Times - Monday, June 19, 2000

You would have thought the sky was falling after racial preferences (also known as traditional affirmative action) were ended in California and Texas. The New York Times and nearly all the rest of the media predicted that from then on many colleges would be almost entirely all-white.

Now, in a May 20 editorial, the New York Times concedes that in California, "minority enrollment has rebounded at the second-tier colleges." But not yet at the elite Berkeley and UCLA campuses. However, those second-tier colleges have high academic standards.

The New York Times ignores the fact that, because of Proposition 209, all the colleges and universities in that state have finally begun to look closely at the life history of each applicant, including poor white applicants. Moreover, for the first time there is aggressive recruitment by college admissions directors at high schools in low-income areas, help from college personnel to set up teacher training and programs to enable students in the lower grades to prepare for college.

As James Traub of the New York Times reported when this form of across-the-board affirmative action was under way in California, "Academics and administrators throughout the system admit that the universities would never have shouldered this burden if it had not been for the elimination of affirmative action". In its May 20 editorial this year, the New York Times points out that in Texas, after the Hopwood court decision forced the end of racial preferences in college admissions there, "black and Latino enrollment dipped precipitously in the first year, but rose again after the legislature passed a law guaranteeing college admission to all students who graduate in the top 10 percent of any public high school class." This includes predominantly white high schools with inferior resources and a high percentage of students whose families have low incomes. Texas colleges previously paid hardly any attention to those schools.

As in California, Texas colleges are now engaged in remedial work on campuses as well as creating programs to raise achievement in the lower schools. Furthermore, instead of focusing on getting more black and Latino applicants into college, there is now an emphasis on the life experiences of all applicants including those who have had to overcome such obstacles as poverty.

This opening of affirmative action beyond race is not only much fairer, it's also constitutional because it provides "equal protection of the laws" as mandated by the 14th Amendment to all students.

And as the courts continue to strike down race-preference affirmative action on constitutional grounds, more states are beginning to realize the crucial need to focus on all failing elementary, middle and high schools, where so many youngsters don't even begin to think of the possibility of applying to a college.

In its recent editorial, the New York Times says: "What all these states have is that the only real way to make race-sensitive policies unnecessary is to guarantee black and Latino children from poor communities a realistic chance at a decent education that prepares them for college."

But the New York Times is still ignoring the many white children and children of other races who need "a realistic chance at a decent education." I have seen predominantly white lower schools in rural Maine, Pennsylvania and other states to which no editorial writer at the New York Times would ever send his children. And there are Asian-American children in failing schools.

Yet even now, that editorial shows concern only for the future of black and Latino youngsters. The New York Times ends its editorial with an urgent call for continuing race-based affirmative action until guarantees of a decent education are in place for minority students. To do otherwise, according to the Times, "is to court civic disaster."

There has been "civic disaster" in many of the nation's lower public schools for generations. But only after the courts began to declare racial preference in college admissions unconstitutional did some college admissions directors and state legislatures start to do something to change the odds against poor and working-class children of all races and ethnic backgrounds.

Ward Connerly who is still being shouted down by black, Latino and liberal white students when he tries to speak at colleges has been a major force, though criticized by the New York Times, in bringing about true equality of opportunity for all of those kids left behind by selective affirmative action.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide