- The Washington Times - Tuesday, January 9, 2001

Singapore comes in first and the United States 12th in a new survey that attempts to measure a country's exposure to the forces of globalization.

The index, released yesterday by the journal Foreign Policy and the business consulting firm A.T. Kearney, is an effort to quantify a phenomenon that has prompted both hope and fear around the world as technology and economic change reshape international relations.

"There are many definitions of globalization out there," said Moises Naim, editor of Foreign Policy.

"What you don't get are the real scope and reach of what people are talking about. We decided to put some numbers to it," he said.

Researchers looked at 50 countries accounting for 95 percent of the world's economic output in 1998. Among the nine factors examined for each country: trade as a percentage of gross domestic economy, percentage of the population using the Internet, foreign direct investment, and the number of minutes of international phone calls per capita.

While the United States scored highest among the top 20 countries on the availability of globalizing technologies like the Internet, other countries ranked far higher in their interactions with the global economy and the exposure of their citizens to those outside the country.

After Singapore, a commercial and financial center for much of Southeast Asia, the next eight places in the index were held by Western European countries, led by the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland.

"Size matters," said Mr. Naim. "There is this notion that globalization works best for the big countries, but we found that the smaller you are, the easier it is to be globalized."

The average Swiss citizen logs four times the number of international telephone minutes as the average American. Foreign direct investment in the Netherlands is five times as high as the United States as a percentage of gross domestic product.

The United States is so big that personal and commercial interactions with foreigners are much less frequent, according to the survey.

Globalization and its byproducts have sparked sometimes violent debate around the world, highlighted by pitched battles in the streets of Seattle, Prague, and Washington over the work of such institutions as the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund.

Paul A. Laudicina, managing director of A.T. Kearney's Global Business Policy Council, said yesterday the new data show that different facets of globalization are moving at different speeds.

The Internet and technological innovation are erasing international barriers at an ever-increasing rate, he noted. But economic aspects of globalization including trade, investment and stock-market investments have slowed in the wake of the Asian and Russian economic crises of 1997 and 1998.

The Foreign Policy index did not measure the cultural aspects of globalization, including rising fears abroad of the dominance of American movies, music and marketing ideas.

But Mr. Laudicina said the survey challenges one of the main criticisms of globalization.

Combining the index rankings with other surveys that compare levels of corruption and democracy, the index found that the countries most open to globalizing forces are also likely to enjoy more political freedom, greater income equality, and lower levels of official corruption.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide