- The Washington Times - Tuesday, June 5, 2001

Move over, John McCain. It doesnt matter that you voted against the Bush tax cut. Theres a new media darling in town.
Remember how pundits scolded former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for saying President Clintons snub on Air Force One contributed to the GOPs moves to close down the federal government? Well, the same people who thought Mr. Gingrich was being a big baby and he was are offended that the Bush White House didnt invite Vermont Sen. James Jeffords to a Rose Garden Teacher of the Year ceremony.
The same people who will never forgive Ralph Nader for bolting the Dem Party happily applaud Mr. Jeffords for standing up for his principles.
I cant get indignant about Mr. Jeffords defection. In politics, these things happen. Its good for a party; keeps the suits on their toes and tilts them toward the middle.
True, Mr. Jeffords could have left with more style. He might have realized that George W. Bushs agenda offended his sensibilities before he started campaigning for him. (As it is, it seems as if Mr. Jeffords was happy to support the GOP, but only as long as the party treaded water.)
Mr. Jeffords might have announced he was resigning his seat to run for re-election as an independent following the lead of Phil Gramm of Texas, who resigned from his House seat when he switched from the Dem to Repub Party. Gramm handily won re-election in 1984, and later was elected to the Senate. But, if Mr. Jeffords wants Mr. Gramm to trump him in the style department, hey, thats his business.
At least Mr. Jeffords stuck with the GOP through the big-and-beautiful tax cut vote Saturday. (The San Francisco Chronicle reports that many Bay Area residents would prefer not to have a tax cut. No doubt these principled folk will return their rebates to Uncle Sam, rather than deposit said checks in their grubby little bank accounts.)
There is one problem, however, and thats the media declaration that Mr. Jeffords is a "moderate." As the Almanac of American Politics notes, Mr. Jeffords was the only Republican in Congress to support the Clinton health-care package.
He has supported more funding for the National Endowment for the Arts, which is hardly a mainstream position. He opposes vouchers to rescue students from ignorance. For too many Repubs, he said last week, "success seems to be measured by the number of students moved out of public schools."
Make that failing public schools, Senator.
National Taxpayers Union Senior Policy Analyst Tom McClusky reviewed Mr. Jeffords legislative record and concluded, "In the 103rd Congress 1993-4], Jeffords overall proposed agenda had a $456 billion price tag, a figure 20 times more than the average Republican senators net agenda to save taxpayers $23 billion."
Indeed, Mr. McClusky found that since the 103rd Congress, Mr. Jeffords proposed spending some $276 billion more the average Democratic senator.
This is moderate?
What appalls Mr. McClusky isnt the GOP losing Mr. Jeffords, but that some GOPers were "trying to keep him in the Republican Party but using taxpayer money to do it" there was talking of increasing federal education spending to keep Mr. Jeffords on the reservation.
What is it about the Beltway? If Mr. Jeffords wanted to cut taxes more than the average Republican, he would be branded an anti-tax radical. But if he wants to add more federal programs that bite into the surplus, he is hailed as a moderate.
Spending is prudent. Not spending is profligate. Abandon logic, all ye who enter.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide