- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 15, 2001

How dare Ted Olson thwart Al Gores attempted coup of the presidency? Well, for some Democrats, its now payback time.
Senate Democrats are refusing to confirm Washington super lawyer Ted Olson as solicitor general if Democrats can call their chief lobbyists with law degrees super lawyers, Im certainly within bounds to call a real lawyer a super lawyer. The media are doing all they can to block Mr. Olson as well. Mr. Olsons principal sin was leading the Bush legal team against Al Gores 36 days of legal hell in Florida.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat, has dredged up an old bogs allegation against Mr. Olson. Mr. Leahy wants to revisit charges that Mr. Olson was involved in the Arkansas Project, an investigation by the American Spectator magazine into the criminal activities of the Clintons.
Now, right on cue, the beltway media are trying to revive this matter. On May 10, The Washington Post ran an extensive piece examining whether Mr. Olson was sufficiently forthcoming in his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his involvement in the Arkansas Project. Hold on just a minute here… . The Post is asking the wrong question.
The issue is not the candor of Ted Olson about the Arkansas Project, but why the Post isnt reporting that theres nothing to this story in the first place. I reported it big time in my book, "Absolute Power." The governments investigation of the Arkansas Project is another example of the Clinton administration, with the complicity of the abysmal Reno Justice Department, demonizing its accusers. Let me give you the highlights:
On Aug. 9, 1998, Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder suggested that Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr initiate an investigation into allegations that conservative philanthropist Richard Mellon Scaife indirectly paid David Hale to testify against Bill Clinton in the Whitewater investigation. Mr. Scaife allegedly channeled the money through the American Spectator magazine by helping to fund its Arkansas Project.
It gets crazier. The main source of the allegations was a lady fortuneteller, a dabbler in the occult, who claimed that her former boyfriend, Parker Dozhier a research assistant for the Arkansas project paid Mr. Hale $5,000 at the time he was cooperating with Mr. Starr in his Whitewater investigation. Both Mr. Hale and Mr. Dozhier denied any payments were made and countered that the fortuneteller was an ardent Democrat given to wild fantasies and bent on ruining Mr. Dozhier.
Mr. Holder attempted to dissuade Mr. Starr from conducting the investigation himself, implying he had a conflict of interest "because of the importance of Hale to your investigation and because the payments allegedly came from funds provided by Richard Scaife." Mr. Holder encouraged Mr. Starr to have the Justice Department investigate. Mr. Clintons attorney and snapping turtle David Kendall piled on and demanded that Mr. Starr refer the matter back to Justice.
Now, heres the rest of the story something you wont read in the mainstream Clinton press. Ultimately, neither Mr. Starr nor Attorney General Janet Reno investigated the matter. Miss Reno appointed former Justice official Michael E. Shaheen Jr. to conduct an independent investigation. He did, and there was no "there" there. In a 168-page report released on July 28, 1999, Mr. Shaheen exonerated all of the accused.
It was wrong for Mr. Clinton and Miss Reno to launch an investigation into this non-story in the first place. It was wrong for them not to apologize to the accused (and to the nation) once an investigation cleared them, including Ted Olson, Ken Starr and the American Spectator. It was wrong for Janet Reno to inform Ken Starr that she was going to investigate him just four days before his scheduled impeachment testimony before Congress. It was wrong for the Justice Department to deliberately leak to the media that this investigation was under way. It was wrong for the media to suppress the results of the special investigation vindicating the wrongly accused. And, it is particularly outrageous for Sen. Leahy and other Democrats to attempt to resurrect this issue now.
Ted Olson committed the unforgivable sin of effectively criticizing Bill Clintons endless misconduct in office. He compounded that sin by thrashing David Boies and the rest of Gores legal army, thereby formally ending the Clinton-Gore-Reno reign of injustice.
The Democrats put their best legal minds up against Ted Olson, and he trounced them. One would think that even they should acknowledge his prowess and get behind his nomination. But to them, as usual, politics trumps the cause of justice.



David Limbaugh is a nationally syndicated columnist.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide