- The Washington Times - Friday, May 18, 2001

Apropos of the Clinton bitter-enders ambush of the Bush administrations nominee for solicitor general, Theodore B. Olson, let me say this: Mr. Olson told the truth to the Judiciary Committee. He was not involved in the American Spectators investigations into the Clintons. Neither he nor his accuser, David Brock, were involved in what has come to be known as the Arkansas Project. And there is more, all of it volupt in irony.
This week The Washington Post reported that the Pew Charitable Trusts (once, I hasten to add, a donor to the American Spectator) have "committed $5.8 million to support Terrence Smiths media reporting unit at PBS." Will this act of journalistic philanthropy some day be known in infamy as the "PBS Project"? The plot thickens. According to The Post, "tax-exempt foundations are quietly spending millions to fund journalism …and even pay the bills for major newspaper, radio and television reporting projects." Why did The Post report this so calmly? This same week (and for the past three years) The Post has reported ominously that foundations controlled by Richard Mellon Scaife "committed" $2.4 million to the American Spectator to "pay the bills for … reporting projects."
The projects were officially titled by the magazine the "Editorial Improvement Project." Considering the many scandals the Clintons created since 1992, its journalists reported mostly on the excesses of the Clintons here and in Arkansas, causing Spectator personnel to refer to it facetiously as the "Arkansas Project." The term has taken on grim meanings in the fevered minds of the Clinton bitter-enders and the more serene minds of the thoughtless, both of whom habitually add that "the project" "dug up dirt on the Clintons." Left unsaid is that the reportage was pioneering, accurate and vindicated by the Clintons behavior in and while exiting the White House. I hope the Pew-funded PBS Project is as accurate as the Scaife-funded Arkansas Project, and for the continued health of the First Amendment I hope Mr. Smith is not put through what my colleagues have been put through for the past three years.
The Arkansas Project and the American Spectator have, at the behest of such morally upright public servants as Sen. Robert Torricelli, New Jersey Democrat, and members of the Clinton Justice Department, undergone a full government investigation. It took place in 1998, and after our full cooperation, appearances before a grand jury, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees, Michael Shaheen of the Justice Departments Office of Professional Responsibility concluded in 1999 that we had acted legally. Moreover, he found that the allegations against us were either "unsubstantiated" or "untrue." The more customary Clintonite judgment is that there is "insufficient evidence to prosecute." Mr. Torricelli might not even fare that well.
Now two years after the last assault on us, the Clinton bitter-enders are again demanding that the American Spectator and the Arkansas Project be investigated. Sen. Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat, is demanding an investigation, even though in the Clinton years he demanded that America "move on" and put the Clinton scandals "behind us." The senator demands that he and his colleagues be able to probe "The projects billing records, the American Spectator audit, and the report." He has sent me a letter demanding to know about the discussions of our internal editorial practices. His efforts pose a threat to both the letter and spirit of the First Amendment, which guarantees a free and robust press. Such governmental interference with freedom of the press must and will be resisted.
Early in 1998 when Monica Lewinsky popped into national view, revealing that Bill Clinton was just the rogue I had said he was, I was told I had been vindicated. As the journalists interviewed me before microphones and television cameras, they were greatly excited and eager for me to gloat. I thought that inappropriate then. Mr. Clinton had provoked a national crisis by his reckless philandering and lying under oath. However, I will gloat now. The Clinton bitter-enders have revealed themselves to be moral vacuums and the very threat to American liberties I always suspected them to be.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is editor in chief of the American Spectator.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide