- The Washington Times - Wednesday, May 2, 2001

Christie Todd Whitman has committed some of the Bush administrations biggest gaffes to date most infamously, her ill-fated crusade to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions at all costs to thwart alleged global warming.
Bush Republicans are right to thwack Mrs. Whitman for espousing a radical agenda that defies basic principles of limited government and economic common sense. But Im not going to join the pinata party. There is neither sport nor valiancy in assaulting such an easy target.
The liberal Republican former governor of New Jersey and current head of the Environmental Protection Agency has never hidden her true colors. Its no surprise she has embraced the EPA tradition of kowtowing to the eco-lobby and promoting junk science. President Bush knew of her green streak when he nominated her to head the EPA. So did every Republican on Capitol Hill yet, not a single one of them spoke against Mrs. Whitman when she was confirmed unanimously by the Senate in January. The GOP has only itself to blame for the curse of Christie.
As the president embarks on his next 100 days, conservatives must reckon with the Bush administrations chief bungler on environmental issues not Mrs. Whitman, but Mr. Bush himself.
To date, Mr. Bush has upheld Clinton-Gore era regulations on everything from lead and land grabs to washing machines and wetlands. The White House continues to perform reverse somersaults on extremist enviro pet causes such as tightening diesel and arsenic regulations to ridiculous, costly and unscientifically justified levels. Most alarming of all is the presidents straddling on Al Gores favorite hobby horse, global warming.
Mr. Bush initially scored points with conservatives when he opposed the Kyoto protocol, the international treaty on greenhouse gases drafted by scare-mongers at the United Nations. The plan pushes draconian regulatory actions on industry despite any scientific consensus that a crisis actually exists. Mrs. Whitman was excoriated for defending the basic principles of Kyoto. But it seems shes only echoing the true views of her boss. Witness Mr. Bushs remarks made in an interview in The Washington Post just this week:
Q: Understanding your objections to the Kyoto protocol, what do you plan to do to demonstrate that the United States is not walking away from that issue?
A: Well, thats a great question because thats the very question every one of these leaders have asked me, and my answers always the same… . Theyve got to understand that the environment is of concern to this administration, that were, I think, the first administration to ever set up mandatory reductions in … nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide and mercury, along with other decisions I made.
appreciate the fact that ours is an administration that said wait a minute, the spirit is fine but the details arent going to work and lets work together to come up with a better protocol, a better way, and we will.
Boasting about imposing "mandatory reductions" of any kind is frighteningly Gore-ific. As Mr. Bush himself reminded Mr. Gore during the campaign, the jury is still out on the primary cause of global warming (human or natural) and whether the effects might actually do more good than harm. And what exactly does Mr. Bush mean when he says the "spirit" of Kyoto is "fine"? The spirit of Kyoto is infected with what environmentalists call the "precautionary principle." This is the idea that nothing should be used, sold, emitted or otherwise approved by the worlds governments until and unless it is proven safe.
If we had applied that cowering standard in the past, we wouldnt have open-heart surgery, penicillin, skyscrapers or the combustion engine. Too much caution can be as dangerous as too little. And spending billions of dollars reducing the theoretical risks of global warming means fewer resources for the real and deadly environmental risks that now plague underdeveloped nations like diarrhea and malaria.
Mr. Bush was supposed to restore rationality to Americas approach to environmental risk in the modern world. Instead, he has sought vainly to score points with soccer moms, Sierra Club dads and MTV deadheads. The result is a pale green policy mish-mash of environmental guacamole that is thoroughly indigestible.


Michelle Malkin is a nationally syndicated columnist.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide